The AM Forum
March 29, 2024, 05:00:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Q: Flex SDR 1000 vs. SDR 5000 differences, limitations, advantages??  (Read 15325 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« on: September 15, 2010, 05:56:03 PM »

Ok,

Simple enough. (yeah, right)  I am thinking I may have to set up a remote station given my current and future personal circumstances. So other than price what are the important, subtle, and TECHNICAL differences, limitations and advantages of the SDR 1000 vs the SDR 5000??

Give me the bird's eye lowdown! Cheesy

                  _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3659



« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2010, 06:27:29 PM »

With the 1000, you can be smug about your superior radio. With the 5000, you are the king of the other smug Flex 1000 operators..   Shocked
Logged
W1AEX
Un-smug-a-licious
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Apache Labs SDR


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2010, 07:13:11 PM »

I have never owned or operated the SDR-1000, so I can only comment on the Flex 5000. It is a snap to set up, has a very complete audio patch panel on the back of the rig, and is capable of cleanly producing positive peaks well above 100%. I have owned mine for about a month and it has been very stable and reliable in all modes from 160 meters to 6 meters. More than half the radio resides in your computer, so keep that aspect in mind.

Rob W1AEX
Logged

One thing I'm certain of is that there is too much certainty in the world.
KA8WTK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 874



« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 07:32:46 PM »

You need to find a way to get in touch with Dave, W9AD. IIRC he runs a Flex station from all over the place remotely.
Logged

Bill KA8WTK
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2010, 09:39:57 PM »

You might want to review the SDR-1000 review article: http://www.flex-radio.com/Data/Doc/2005-10_QST_Review.pdf and the Flex-5000 review article: http://support.flexradio.com/Downloads.aspx?id=224 so that you can compare the specs of both units.

There are many night and day differences between the two products. One of the big problems with the SDR-1000 was the use of an outboard sound card and all the interconnecting cables. RFI issues were not uncommon. Flex 5000 has all sound card functions built right into the main board.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
WB2EMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 633



« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2010, 10:34:35 PM »

Isn't there a transmit audio bandwidth limitation in the Flex-3000 and Flex-5000 in the firmware that doesn't exist in the SDR-1000? I think I've heard 3750 hz in AM mode. I recall hearing some fuss and discussion about it. Perhaps it's been relieved by now.

The SDR-1000 can develop some connection issues between the various boards. Some folks end up soldering in some connections to get around issues.

I've been running the SDR-1000 last year (and fighting some of those connection issues) and considering moving to a flex-3000. Also interested in remote operation. I've done that with a ts-2000 using ham radio deluxe and it's handy at times and would like to be able to do it with the sdr as well.
Logged

73 de Kevin, WB2EMS
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2010, 12:25:34 AM »

Flex 3000:
Transmitter

Bandwidth:
Flat Response 10 Hz to 3.650 KHz (SSB), Software EQ optional
Flat Response 10 Hz to 7.300 KHz (AM/DSB), Software EQ optional
Complete specs here: http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50352.aspx

Flex 5000:
Transmitter
Audio Response (SSB):

Flat Response 10 Hz to 20 KHz, Software EQ optional
Complete specs here: http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50044.aspx

Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
N3WWL
Founding
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2010, 07:36:10 AM »

With the recent introduction of PowerSDR 2.X, the Flex 3000 has an increase in AM transmit bandwidth from 3650 to 4500.  So much for the theory that it was a hardware related limit.
Logged
WB2EMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 633



« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2010, 10:12:55 AM »

Quote
With the recent introduction of PowerSDR 2.X, the Flex 3000 has an increase in AM transmit bandwidth from 3650 to 4500.  So much for the theory that it was a hardware related limit.

Ah, that's interesting, and welcome news. I think I see a flex 3000 out there in my future.  Grin
Logged

73 de Kevin, WB2EMS
wa2dtw
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 155


« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2010, 11:43:34 AM »

I have used both.
For AM, they are both about the same.
For CW, the 5000 is much, much better because of separate transmit/receive streams.   This allows near-QSK.
The receiver on the 5000 is notably superior.
In the current version of power-SDR, I have heard that the audio on the 1000 is superior to the 3000.   Perhaps the new power-SDR will change that.
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2010, 01:29:35 PM »

With the recent introduction of PowerSDR 2.X, the Flex 3000 has an increase in AM transmit bandwidth from 3650 to 4500.  So much for the theory that it was a hardware related limit.

Note: There has been no official release of PowerSDR 2.X yet. It is still a beta release.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
W1AEX
Un-smug-a-licious
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Apache Labs SDR


WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2010, 01:49:24 PM »

As Pete said, 2.x.x is still in beta, however, it has come a long way and is probably only a few betas short of final release. The current 2.0.8 has run stable and glitch free for me. One other thing I would mention is that the noise blanker function is impressive with 2.x.x releases. On 6 meters, I have one beam heading to the SW where a distant pole sputters now and then and produces about 3 S-units of noise. The noise blanker cleans it right up in all modes. My Pro III never could eliminate that noise. I would expect that the 3000 and 1000 probably behave the same under 2.x.x PSDR releases.

That's great news on the increased bandwidth with the 3000 Jay! I'm looking forward to hooking up with you on the WFD net to compare some notes with you regarding the Flex 2.x.x platform.

Bear, one other difference between the 5k/3k and the sdr-1000, if 6 meters is relevant to your operating needs, is that some SDR-1000 variants did not run 100 watts on 6 meters. Someone with a 1000 can clarify that, but I think there was a power amp module available as an option at some point.

Rob W1AEX
Logged

One thing I'm certain of is that there is too much certainty in the world.
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2010, 02:18:38 PM »

This link will provide you some insight into the breakdown of the original SDR-1000 models:
http://web.archive.org/web/20050323064259/http://www.flex-radio.com/ Look to the left and click on Products.

My SDR-1000 came with 100 watts 6-160 meters. Some SDR-1000's were also plagued with various spurs across the frequency coverage range. After I got my 5000, my SDR-1000 became a vague memory.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
WB2EMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 633



« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2010, 02:53:58 PM »

Will powerSDR 2.x run on the SDR-1000? I have spent about a half hour on the web site and google trying to figure that out, and not able to find anything definitive on it. I have to confess, the way the flex web sites are organized, I just seem to have a terrible time finding out what I want to. Feels like clicking 'help' on a Microsoft product. Lots of text, not much help.  Grin
Logged

73 de Kevin, WB2EMS
W1AEX
Un-smug-a-licious
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Apache Labs SDR


WWW
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2010, 05:11:44 PM »

When I installed 2.0.8 for my 5000 the option to select SDR-1000 was present. On page 29 of the Flex 5000 2.0.x manual that is available here: 

http://support.flexradio.com/Downloads.aspx?fr=1

it shows a screenshot of the part of the installation where the SDR-1000 can be selected. I honestly don't know anyone with an SDR-1000 who is running it though. Might be worth posting in the SDR-1000 section of the Flex Forums to see how it has worked out for people:

http://forums.flexradio.com/Forum46-1.aspx
Logged

One thing I'm certain of is that there is too much certainty in the world.
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2010, 07:27:33 PM »

OR.... do what most people do and just download it and TRY it !  Grin

The PowerSDR software runs more radios than even Flex knows about...

Logged

W2PHL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


Phil


WWW
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2010, 11:49:45 AM »

There seems to be an ongoing confusion between frequency response and AM transmit bandwidth. I have the Flex 1500. The frequency response is 10 Hz to 3.65 KHz for an AM bandwidth of 7.3 KHz. I would be terrific if the frequency response was really 10 Hz to 7.3 KHz! (AM bandwidth 14.6 KHz) I understand the Flex 3000 has been bumped from 3.65 KHz to 4.5 KHz for an AM bandwidth of 9 KHz.  To make matters even more confusing, page nine of the Flex 1500 owner's manual states the TX audio frequency response is 10 Hz to 20 KHz which would equal a 40 Khz AM bandwidth.

Phil
Logged

I think therefore AM
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2010, 05:02:54 PM »

With the recent introduction of PowerSDR 2.X, the Flex 3000 has an increase in AM transmit bandwidth from 3650 to 4500.  So much for the theory that it was a hardware related limit.

Is that +/- 4500 or +/- 2250??

          _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
W1AEX
Un-smug-a-licious
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Apache Labs SDR


WWW
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2010, 11:26:37 PM »

Is that +/- 4500 or +/- 2250??

          _-_-bear

For the Flex 3000 that would be plus and minus 4500, which would allow you to produce a 9 kc wide AM signal, or a 4.5 kc wide SSB signal.

The 5000 is configured to allow plus and minus 10 kc which would allow you to produce up to a 20 kc wide AM signal, or a 10 kc wide SSB signal. I believe the SDR-1000 has the same bandwidth capability as the 5000.
Logged

One thing I'm certain of is that there is too much certainty in the world.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2010, 06:31:42 AM »

In addition to Dave W9AD, Bill W1MPY (who is on a lot, and you can hear and talk with during the day when you're usually on) runs remote all the time from various hotel rooms across the country.

I think he's using remote desktop for control, and skype for audio.  It works, but there are probably better alternatives for getting the audio from where you are back to where the equipment is.

A *FAST* and RELIABLE  Internet connection is mandatory.
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2010, 05:26:02 PM »

With the recent introduction of PowerSDR 2.X, the Flex 3000 has an increase in AM transmit bandwidth from 3650 to 4500.  So much for the theory that it was a hardware related limit.

Note: There has been no official release of PowerSDR 2.X yet. It is still a beta release.

...and requires a little tweaking to get it working - or so I've heard

A
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.