The AM Forum
April 24, 2024, 06:37:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Dont buy a flex radio...  (Read 45964 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Slab Bacon
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3934



« Reply #50 on: October 26, 2009, 09:39:52 AM »


October 24, 2009 8:28pm EDT

Thank you for joining the ARRL!
Your membership application has been received online and our records will be updated within a few days.
Transaction ID#    0929606121
Amount Paid:    $39.00
Card Used:    xxxxxxxxxxxx2700 (Visa)



Geeeezzeeee! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  Whatz this world coming to? ? ?  Huh Huh

2-meter slopbucket, joining the ARRL, Next thing you know he'll be givin up the BC rigs and buying a ricebox  Grin  Grin
Logged

"No is not an answer and failure is not an option!"
The Slab Bacon
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3934



« Reply #51 on: October 26, 2009, 09:52:13 AM »

Looking gently at the SDR users, I bet they're swept up in the same enthusiasm they want to share with others.  
I agree however, that it's a legitimate complaint if such users deliberately put down other rigs to try to make theirs look better.


Kinda like the "class-E" boys   Wink  Grin
Logged

"No is not an answer and failure is not an option!"
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #52 on: October 26, 2009, 10:30:36 AM »

Looking gently at the SDR users, I bet they're swept up in the same enthusiasm they want to share with others. 
I agree however, that it's a legitimate complaint if such users deliberately put down other rigs to try to make theirs look better.


Kinda like the "class-E" boys   Wink  Grin


nice..........
Logged

Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #53 on: October 26, 2009, 10:44:16 AM »

Or the "I run a broadcast transmitter" snobs.


Looking gently at the SDR users, I bet they're swept up in the same enthusiasm they want to share with others. 
I agree however, that it's a legitimate complaint if such users deliberately put down other rigs to try to make theirs look better.


Kinda like the "class-E" boys   Wink  Grin
Logged
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13312



« Reply #54 on: October 26, 2009, 11:56:12 AM »

Quote
Think I'll join the ARRL tonight, I ain't feeling right.

I think I figured out why Paul has had a problem with ARRL. Yesterday I was over at my son's place and he was having a problem with a control circuit on a model car. A 330 uf cap at 16 volts broke off the control board. My son who has little electronic  knowledge always refers to a 1995 ARRL handbook I gave him when he runs into areas where he is unsure of something. I was paging through it and in the beginning  of the book, there is WA3VJB's picture with his equipment in the background sporting a goatee. Did they stop using your image after that? Is that the problem Grin Grin
Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #55 on: October 26, 2009, 12:48:40 PM »

That shot is kinda scary.


Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #56 on: October 26, 2009, 02:22:38 PM »

I remember one Sunday morning around 6AM at Gathersburg, after a Saturday night meditation session, when we all looked scary.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1954


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #57 on: October 26, 2009, 06:42:38 PM »

"...there is WA3VJB's picture with his equipment in the background sporting a goatee."

I wonder if my equipment would better sporting a goatee? Hmmmm......
Logged

AMI#1684
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13312



« Reply #58 on: October 26, 2009, 08:47:20 PM »

Quote
I wonder if my equipment would better sporting a goatee? Hmmmm......

Absolutely. I know a lot of males these days are into that clean shaven look, but hair on your equipment may not only be the norm, but be required according to sociologists studying this more recent  phenomenon, not to mention baggy pants.    
Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #59 on: October 26, 2009, 09:03:38 PM »

Hair on an organ.



* Goatee.jpg (173.92 KB, 480x360 - viewed 641 times.)
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #60 on: October 26, 2009, 09:58:14 PM »

Here's my 2 cents:

Last night I met an old friend (Crackers, ssb, 3921).  He said "Al see you after the net."  OK, so after the net I saw that a 4 land QSO on 3920 would be much better avoided if we slid up a couple KC.  So I said to my friend "Al (yes, two Al's talking to each other) it's clearer a couple KC up -- see you there."  I called him and things were progressing great until 7:28 and some 4 land net guy said "This is W4??? standing by for the (whatever) net."  A co-channel problem in the making.  I noticed that 3917 was clear so I said "There's a clear spot on 3917, see you there."  Brought up the cross hairs and put it on 3917 left clicked  - instant QSY and we picked up without skipping a beat.  The rest of the QSO went on uninterrupted.   I love that feature plus the excellent performance of the Flex 5000.

Didn't have to ask "is this frequency in use?" because I knew it wasn't -- a habit that a Flexer develops - watching the band for what's on for activity.

Regards, Al  VTP
Logged
K6JEK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1189


RF in the shack


« Reply #61 on: October 27, 2009, 11:00:57 AM »

Quote
Could be anything. For some it is anything with tubes, for others it may be an over-rated St James Grey box.

The question I asked was was, what were the Bottom Feeder Transmitters?
I don't know which ones Carl had a bad experience with or heard? Gonset, Heath, I just don't know. There was a lot of nice transmitters back then because it was mostly before repeaters and there could have been some really cheap stuff I hadn't heard of.  Maybe there is a new thing going around that might be labeled as the FLEX TREATMENT. I noticed when I operate remotely from a site in CT, people are not very enthused by the concept probably because I'm using a computer to talk to them via the internet.   
I'm enthused or at least interested.  What is your remote set up?

Jon
Logged
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13312



« Reply #62 on: October 27, 2009, 11:18:18 AM »

Quote
I'm enthused
 Well it's a fellow ham in CT who is using a TS-2000. I haven't been using it lately because he was sighting the cost of electricity and the fact that now that winter is approaching,he is using the system more often.

Send me a PM and I'll give you his call sign, perhaps he'll let you use his stuff. It was over two months before I received an invite.He was very nice about talking me through the set up. You will need Skipe to make it work and another program called Log Me In.

Hello AL  
Quote
Didn't have to ask "is this frequency in use?" because I knew it wasn't -- a habit that a Flexer develops - watching the band for what's on for activity.


Do you know anyone about 99 years old that has one and would put me in their will Grin Grin Grin

That must be a very handy feature.

Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13312



« Reply #63 on: October 27, 2009, 11:39:41 AM »

Looks like this would be in reach of many of us poorer hams. Just the thing to drive a 4-400.

FLEX-1500™ QRP Software Defined Radio will start shipping in Dec 2009.



http://www.flex-radio.com//Products.aspx?topic=F1.5k_features

Here is the comparison of the others Flexers compared to the 1500

http://www.flex-radio.com//Products.aspx?topic=SDR_Feature_Matrix

I think I'm hooked Grin Grin  They use a term called TBD?? Maybe to be determined??

All that for $579.00. I guess this would be below the snooty range Grin Grin Grin
Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #64 on: October 27, 2009, 01:11:48 PM »

Hair on an organ.



OR tulips on an organ!

Is that the infamous Hammond B3?? With the Leslie cabinet?
Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #65 on: October 27, 2009, 02:46:04 PM »

Hair on an organ.



OR tulips on an organ!

Is that the infamous Hammond B3?? With the Leslie cabinet?
Fred

HA  -- remember that one --
What's better than Roses On A Piano ...


Yes, that's a 1960 B-3 that we bought from a woman in Baltimore, who had been playing it at a bar near Fells Point for many years. All kinds of cigarette burns and drink rings on that lid.  In the background was ANOTHER Hammond, a rare two-generator job whose bearings were shot on the tonewheel shafts. Too bad. Drilled a couple holes underneath and sprayed WD-40 every so often to shut it up. 
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #66 on: October 28, 2009, 12:21:18 AM »

I'd check the tx frequency response on AM before getting a 3000 or 1500.  you might become yellerfied  Tongue

Rob
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #67 on: October 28, 2009, 04:07:05 AM »

I'd check the tx frequency response on AM before getting a 3000 or 1500.  you might become yellerfied  Tongue

Rob

Did you see the specs on the Flex-1500? Last I heard, they hadn't published them yet because their testing wasn't completed.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13312



« Reply #68 on: October 28, 2009, 08:13:44 AM »

Quote
Did you see the specs on the Flex-1500? Last I heard, they hadn't published them yet because their testing wasn't completed.

That must be what that "TBD" means  I'm going to send them an emial today and ax them about the freq response on AM. Maybe they'll tell me. Has anyone ever axed them a question?

Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
W2PHL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


Phil


WWW
« Reply #69 on: October 28, 2009, 09:29:29 AM »

I guess they feel the need to differentiate the product line. Everyone was assuming the TX bandwidth on the 3000 would be the same as the 5000 but it seems Flex is limiting it to 3.6Khz via the firmware, not cool. Applying Flex-logic the 1500 should be limited to 1.8Khz! I might have to cancel my 1500 order.
Logged

I think therefore AM
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #70 on: October 28, 2009, 10:58:41 AM »

What I know is that on SSB tx the 5000 allows narrow to wide response; the 3K restricts the tx response to (I thought it was 3000 hz but is it 3.6 KHz?  okay) and I heard the 1500 would be the same.  Now, of course AM may be different.  And, compared to SSB, 3600 Hz on AM is not, to me at least, intolerable, and there are plenty of times when it is desirable but I would like the option of being able to go for a higher fidelity response for certain circumstances, narrowing the baseband audio instead.

Rob
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #71 on: October 28, 2009, 11:05:06 AM »

I spoke with Jay - N3WWL in the past week. He was running his new Flex. If the audio bandwidth was limited, it was not noticeable on his signal. I don't doubt that on a quiet band and a wide receiver, some difference would be noticable. But more often than not, the RX bandwidth is not available (either due to receiver limitations or due to QRM) to hear the difference.
Logged
W1AEX
Un-smug-a-licious
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Apache Labs SDR


WWW
« Reply #72 on: October 28, 2009, 01:04:21 PM »

I would definitely agree with Steve on this. I was very skeptical about the Flex 3000 with its firmware imposed 3.6kc bandwidth limitation, but Jay sounded very nice in the AM mode. The audio was smooth, well balanced, and pleasant to listen to. As Jay pointed out, it's actually 3.6 + 3.6 = 7.2kc in the AM mode, so that's not too far off from the typical 5 + 5 that many guys run with the Flex 1000/5000 series. I wish I had taken the time to record a few minutes of his audio.

There was a very nasty thread in the Flex forum back about 6 months ago, regarding Flex's decision to limit the TX bandwidth in the 1500/3000 series. One Flex forum rep made it clear that it was not done as a result of any pressure from the FCC, but he steered away from giving any rationale for their decision. The thread was locked when the "Thou shall not exceed 2.4kc" bandwidth preachers became very agitated by the concept of a transceiver being sold that might exceed their desires for a narrower world. Speculation was that the decision might make the Flex 1500/3000 series more compatible with the requirements of overseas markets, but no one could confirm this. It appears that most of that original thread was deleted by the moderator(s).
Logged

One thing I'm certain of is that there is too much certainty in the world.
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #73 on: October 28, 2009, 01:14:11 PM »

Need to read the specs:
Flex 5000A or 5000C - For AM operation, the transmit audio response is from 10 Hz to 20 kHz, since it's controlled by the software. http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50044.aspx

Flex 3000 - For AM operation, the transmit audio response is from 10 Hz to 7.3 kHz, since it's controlled only by the firmware. http://kc.flex-radio.com/KnowledgebaseArticle50352.aspx

Flex 1500 - No published specs yet but now have a picture of what it will look like:


If you want to compare the different features between them, go here:
http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=SDR_Feature_Matrix
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #74 on: October 28, 2009, 01:56:37 PM »

What is the problem with the AMFONE web site? If I try to quote a long response, the window to type my reply along with the Quote jumps and I cannot get to the bottom of the quote to start typing...................Happens on every computer I use to access AMFONE. Three home computers and a work computer 33 mi. from home.

I was going to quote Rob about the display from SDR being a distraction. I find it pretty useful using my simple SoftRock Lite board that I can enable the proper filter or move the I.F. around to get away from an offending signal or broad signal or splatter from an A.M. QSO 4 kc away. And the listening pleasure resumes, instead of cursing and swearing.

Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 18 queries.