The AM Forum
November 04, 2024, 06:59:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Johnson Matchbox 160 Meter Mods - Experiences/Suggestions?  (Read 63524 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
W1UJR
Guest
« on: September 05, 2008, 10:07:40 AM »

Wonder if anyone has used the 160 meter Matchbox mods suggested by Bowie Bill in Electric Radio?
With winter approaching, and the beginning of the 160 meter "season", I'd like to get strapping signal out on 160, so I'd be interested in your experiences.

I tried the lash up on my KW Matchbox last night and it seems to work well, very little inductor heating even at 1KW of RF input.
Bill had suggested the use of series of fixed doorknob caps across the stators of the tuning air variable cap.
No having an set of fixed caps on hand, I used an old Johnson air variable for the task, clip leaded into the circuit.

What I am looking for is an elegant way to switch this in and out, either with a direct toggle, or vacuum relay.
There is no simple way to add an additional position on the band switch like the 275 watt version.

What are you thoughts about using a toggle switch for this, is the lead inductance going to be a problem?
Is there a potential flashpoint on voltage peaks, between the switch on the chassis it would be mounted too?
Will disconnecting only one lead on the cap be ok, or should it be disconnected on both ends when not operating on 160?

Aside from the power handling advantages of the KW vs the 275 watt version, Kurt Sterba in his series "Reflections", mentions that the KW unit is more efficient, and will enhance receiver sensitivity. Something to the effect that the larger box will allow you to hear things the smaller box won't, I'll have to search for the exact quote. Now I like Kurt's work, always right on point, but wonder if this is really accuruate.
Thoughts on this?


Tnx!

Bruce W1UJR
http://www.w1ujr.net/bruces_bench.htm
Logged
w4bfs
W4 Beans For Supper
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1432


more inpoot often yields more outpoot


« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2008, 10:20:17 AM »

There was an unpublished mod done by EFJ for this purpose ... switch in two, one each of the inductor ends of C1 a 400pF 3kV 5Amp transmitting mica to ground ... recommended to use a heavy duty relay and route control outside to avoid hammy hambone type mod, unless thats what you want .. oh yes, use the 80mtr Flashbox setting ... just one of several ways to do ....hope this helps, Bruce ... 73 ...John

p.s. The efficiency thing about 275W vs KW boxes was first noted in a 60's QST article (3 parts) about station design for DX ... sure sings praises on 75A4 ... still goood stuff
Logged

Beefus

O would some power the gift give us
to see ourselves as others see us.
It would from many blunders free us.         Robert Burns
Mike/W8BAC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1040



WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2008, 10:51:31 AM »

Bruce,

I'm collecting parts to build a modern match box based on the link coupled Johnson/Annecke designs. It will cover BCB to 30 MHz and able to handle very high current and voltages.

I missed the ER article with the 160 meter matchbox mod's. Can you post the year and month please.

Mike
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2008, 11:00:35 AM »

Hi John,
Good note, thanks, guess that confirms what Sterba wrote.
Now I will have to hunt up my old QSTs to review that.
I've been delighted with my 275 watt Matchbox, handles the 30K and 1KW Icom no problem, but perhaps I'm missing out.
Was not aware that article, so tnx for the tip OM.

As for control, I'd prefer to have the caps switched in and out via a manual switch, rather that running
power and control lines inside the box, just another route to couple RF in/out. Thanks for taking the time to respond.


Mike,

I have don't have the exact date in front of me.
But I do the article at home in digital form, email ok, or I can mail if that is easier?

Also you may want to take a look at W2XS interesting notes on the Matchbox -->> http://www.qsl.net/w2xs/New%20Life%20for%20the%20Johnson%20Matchbox.pdf

72 ES BTU DE W1UJR
Logged
Mike/W8BAC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1040



WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2008, 11:07:19 AM »

Email is fine. Thanks

w8bac at comcast dot net

Mike
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2008, 11:18:05 AM »

There is a lot of high voltage at the ends of the coil. How about trying the cap across the output terminals. you might get lucky.
You would need at least a 7000 volt switch or relay since that is the rating of the caps. 
Logged
W3SLK
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2690

Just another member member.


« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2008, 11:48:13 AM »

Hmmmm, it seems to me that the ER mod utilized the internal antenna relay to switch what I remember a 100 µµf cap across the the coil. I used that pretty successfully with the 275 matchbox.
Logged

Mike(y)/W3SLK
Invisible airwaves crackle with life, bright antenna bristle with the energy. Emotional feedback, on timeless wavelength, bearing a gift beyond lights, almost free.... Spirit of Radio/Rush
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2008, 12:07:07 PM »

You know I bet that would work if the relay coil can stay on and not overheat. 
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8137


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2008, 12:39:26 PM »

The Electric Radio Magazine Index has been mentioned frequently here on the board.
It's updated monthly. Bookmark it.

http://home.wi.rr.com/n9oo/ersearch.html
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8137


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2008, 12:46:51 PM »

From FBTO INDEX:

Extending Johnson Matchbox Range - QST, Dec. 1963, page 67
Matchbox Improvements, Ham Radio Mag., July 1979, page 45, and Sept. 1979, page 92
Modernizing Johnson Viking Matchbox, 73 Mag., June 1978, page 84
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2008, 01:01:05 PM »

Pete, you're the man, thanks for posting that!
I wish it would work with a Mac, Safari (the Mac browser), cuts off the end of the form, so I am unable to search it.

Mike, I think that Bill had installed some additional inductance on the 275 Matchbox, along with an extra position on the band switch.
He mentioned that he needed to remove one of the insulators for spacing reasons, as he was switching the inductors off the end of the center inductor.
I don't use the internal T/R relay, so that certainly would be a simple answer, if it can handle the voltage peaks Frank mentioned.
My concern is that I want to use this on 160 - 10, so sure that I'm going to encounter some crazy voltages.

I've always liked the Matchbox design with no balun, it is really quite elegant.
Just wish that old E.F. had thought about 160, but then again that was not popular band at the time.

Another thing I thought of was just removing all the componets from the metal Matchbox cabinet and mounted on a nice wood, cherry is ideal, breadboard.
Would have that classic 1930s look, and the extra space would also allow me to install the additional air variable cap right into the circuit, could easily jumper the cap in and out of circuit. I could mount the unit right on the wall next to the balance feed.

Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2008, 01:17:40 PM »

I found the fugly balanced / balanced tuner and kW match box produced the same feeder current at 1 KW. I would not trash the tuner I would build a homebrew get it working and save the box as a spare or set up a second antenna..   
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2008, 02:01:25 PM »

I found the fugly balanced / balanced tuner and kW match box produced the same feeder current at 1 KW. I would not trash the tuner I would build a homebrew get it working and save the box as a spare or set up a second antenna..   


I would agree Frank, only this unit has been "Collinsnized" by the previous owner.
The cover was repainted, and Collins "meatball" logo attached with double sided tape.
I should post a photo, its a hoot!
I was thinking of having it powder coated in black wrinkle, but I like the open air look of things.

I've got all the parts and pieces right there, and it would be an easy matter to put it back together.
Logged
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2008, 11:04:40 AM »

Quote
I would agree Frank, only this unit has been "Collinsnized" by the previous owner.
The cover was repainted, and Collins "meatball" logo attached with double sided tape.
I should post a photo, its a hoot!

please do! double sided tape is real classy and sceams "Art Collins wuz here" desingnin yur matchbox.
Logged
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2008, 12:19:17 PM »

bruce, there is enough space on he back end of the factory bandswitch to mount a good stout ceramic wafer switch and a careful mounting hole in back to latch the back end shaft  onto. switch yer C or yer L or both using the factory bandswitch. was going to do his to mine but I'm sick of working on stuff and just want to get on the air now.

just use your 40 meter taps for 80 on the factory coil after extending the straps to the coil ends use the 80 meter straps to switch in yr 160 meter stuff.

Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2008, 09:24:46 PM »

Quote
Aside from the power handling advantages of the KW vs the 275 watt version, Kurt Sterba in his series "Reflections", mentions that the KW unit is more efficient, and will enhance receiver sensitivity. Something to the effect that the larger box will allow you to hear things the smaller box won't, I'll have to search for the exact quote. Now I like Kurt's work, always right on point, but wonder if this is really accuruate.
Thoughts on this?

I'd say Kurt is way off on this. Most often, on HF, whether you can hear someone is determined by the incoming SNR. If the Matchbox is more efficient, it will be more efficient for both the signal and the noise and the SNR will be unchanged.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2008, 09:47:56 PM »

Steve,
True unless the KW box has a lot higher Q. 
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2008, 10:33:43 PM »

I need to look at the QST articles and see what they have to say.
Or ask our resident expert here, Walt W2DU.

I'll see if I can look up and post a summary here.
I'm interested myself.

BTW, that Matchbox with the added C is working well on 160, think I may just leave it like that, and add a nice knife switch to kick the C out of circuit when its not wanted.

As for the info Pete mentioned earlier:
Well the 1967 QST was about adding B&W coil stock to the output of the rear the Matchbox, not really a mod for 160.
I don't have Ham Radio or 73 magazine on the computer, so can't comment there.
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2008, 11:06:09 PM »

Even then it doesn't matter. The SNR is the SNR. Unless you mean the Q would be so high as to make the bandwidth less than that of the receiver. But with a Q that high, the loss on transmit would be horrendous.


Steve,
True unless the KW box has a lot higher Q. 
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2008, 08:40:46 AM »

true.
Logged
Ralph W3GL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 748



« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2008, 05:44:55 PM »

Pete...

I checked your reference to the "Ham Radio" , Sept. '79, PP92 and
it is not the Johnson Match Box!  It is, however, the Drake Matching
network. No relation to "Johnson"...

The June, '79, PP45 is about adding a switch to apparently extend
the matching range but not the frequency range of the box.

I use a piece of B&W coil stock as an autotransformer when I run into
balanced feeders that are way beyond the internal range of the box.

I clip lead the coil externally as either step-up or step-down depending
on output frequency and feed line length.

My 275 watt match box has seen action in contest  operations, pushing
the envelope on power output and still keeps ticking!

Have yet to attempt putting 160 on it as I want to keep the box intact.
Perhaps something external using feed throughs out the back?

Logged

73,  Ralph  W3GL 

"Just because the microphone in front of you amplifies your voice around the world is no reason to think we have any more wisdom than we had when our voices could reach from one end of the bar to the other"     Ed Morrow
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8137


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2008, 07:14:09 PM »

Pete...

I checked your reference to the "Ham Radio" , Sept. '79, PP92 and
it is not the Johnson Match Box!  It is, however, the Drake Matching
network. No relation to "Johnson"...

The June, '79, PP45 is about adding a switch to apparently extend
the matching range but not the frequency range of the box.



Ham Radio Magazine July 1979, page 45
The Sept 1979, page 92, is Feedback on the original July article.

Of course, if you're an ARRL member, you can go here to also review the QST, QEX, and Ham Radio Indexes:
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/qqnsearch.html
My index includes CQ but doesn't include QEX.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Ralph W3GL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 748



« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2008, 07:38:00 PM »

Pete...

I'm a 54 year member (Life member as of 1970) of ARRL !

I checked the index you mentioned and see that Demaw item
you mentioned but my QST collection is unavailable at this time
and I'm too cheap to request a photo copy from CT...

Oh well...

Later,

Ralph.
Logged

73,  Ralph  W3GL 

"Just because the microphone in front of you amplifies your voice around the world is no reason to think we have any more wisdom than we had when our voices could reach from one end of the bar to the other"     Ed Morrow
ka3zlr
Guest
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2008, 07:51:16 PM »

Ralph you been a member longer than I've been walking on this planet...That's Dedication.....Wow....54 years....Wholly Smokes....
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8137


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2008, 08:21:58 PM »

Pete...

I'm a 54 year member (Life as well) of ARRL !

I checked the index you mentioned and see that Demaw item
you mentioned but my QST collection is unavailable at this time
and I'm too cheap to request a photo copy from CT...

Oh well...

Later,

Ralph.


Demaw didn't have any articles about the Matchbox.

Of couse, you can always Google "Johnson Matchbox" and review some of the 578 hits  including one that's called "Extending the Johnson Matchbox Range".
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 18 queries.