The AM Forum
March 28, 2024, 01:28:42 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WRC-07 Amateur Radio Agenda Items Survive Preparatory Meeting  (Read 5523 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« on: March 12, 2007, 07:43:05 PM »

Too early to tell where this is going.

NEWINGTON, CT, Mar 12, 2007 -- Technical report text on two World Radiocommunication Conference 2007 (WRC-07) agenda items of interest to Amateur Radio has survived the WRC-07 Conference Preparatory Meeting (CPM-07). The nearly 600-page Conference Preparatory Meeting Report (CPM Report) still reflects the International Amateur Radio Union's (IARU) desired options for agenda items (AIs) 1.13 and 1.15, thanks to the efforts of the IARU delegation. AI 1.13 addresses the allocation of HF spectrum between 4 and 10 MHz, including the possibility of allocation changes in the 40 and 60 meter bands, while AI 1.15 opens the possibility of a secondary ham radio allocation in the vicinity of 136 kHz.

For the rest of the ARRL story, go here:
http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/12/100/?nc=1

For those that are waiting for 10 meters to open, you might want amuse yourself with reading the IARU's Conference Preparatory Meeting Report:
CPM Report
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2007, 12:09:46 PM »

Here's a good article on some of the issues and frequencies under consideration at the WRC. The article contains much non-amateur radio stuff (not surprising since this will be the bulk of the WRC), but it looks like the HF spectrum will also come into play.

Quote
DOD also has an interest in whether the ITU decides to protect high-frequency (HF) spectrum from encroachment by shortwave broadcasters worldwide. All three military services rely on HF for long-range terrestrial communications.
Fighting to retain control of the HF bands might seem like a last-ditch stand to keep horse-drawn buggies, some spectrum experts say. Broadcasters, such as the BBC, have moved from HF and now rely on satellite and Internet feeds.

But the development of high-quality digital radio broadcasting technology has changed the picture and made HF suddenly more appealing. Shortwave broadcasters worldwide want the ITU to allocate to them as much as 800 KHz of additional spectrum in the HF band from 4 MHz to 10 MHz.

A new golden age
Analog shortwave broadcasts are typically interrupted by hisses and pops. But the new technology, Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM), will enable shortwave broadcasters to transmit programs thousands of miles with the signal quality and audio clarity of FM radio, said Nigel Holmes, transmission manager at Radio Australia.

DRM could lead to a golden age for shortwave broadcasting, Holmes said.

Broadcasters worldwide — the BBC, Deutsche Welle in Germany, Radio France, Radio Sweden, Radio Canada and Radio New Zealand — have embraced it. The National Association of Shortwave Broadcasters in the United States, most of whose members are religious broadcasters, supports DRM, and it has urged the FCC to push for allocating additional HF spectrum for broadcasting.

But Eric Johnson, professor of engineering at New Mexico State University and a member of the AFCEA International HF Industry Association, said HF is equally well-positioned to support a golden age of data communications. Thanks to new standards, some of which Johnson helped develop, HF can support data rates of 9,600 bits/sec in a 3 KHz channel and 64 bits/sec in a 12 KHz channel.

In an era in which users can access the Internet at speeds measured in megabytes of data, 64 bits/sec does seem like horse-drawn buggy speed, but it exceeds the data rate of satellite communication systems on some of the Navy’s smallest ships, Johnson said. The Air Force already relies on HF in its High Frequency Global Communications System to transmit e-mail messages to airlifters the Air Mobility Command operates.

The Homeland Security Department’s Customs and Border Protection organization operates a nationwide HF network to communicate with its boats, planes, helicopters and vehicular assets, Johnson said. Australia and the United Kingdom recently installed new HF networks. Those DHS and overseas networks could be undermined if shortwave broadcasters receive expanded HF spectrum allocations, Johnson said. 

Younes said HF spectrum is critical to DOD’s combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and relief operations such as those DOD conducted in late 2004 and early 2005 after a tsunami hit many Asian and Indian Ocean countries. DOD must protect HF spectrum from broadcasters’ incursions as it develops new Internet-based applications for HF, he said. HF is essential for communications with partner countries in multinational coalitions, many of whom use it as their sole means of communications, he added.

The FCC has deliberated but has not reached a decision about whether to back the shortwave broadcasters or the government’s tactical and mobile users of HF spectrum. Johnson said the FCC needs to side with DOD and other federal stakeholders and do so well ahead of the conference to protect HF spectrum that DOD and other federal agencies use. Many countries are waiting to learn the U.S. policy position before they solidify their own, and an early signal from the United States could slow the broadcasters’ momentum in seeking additional HF spectrum, he said.

Full article at http://www.fcw.com/article97846-03-12-07-Print
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2007, 03:59:36 PM »

To get an ear full of what DRM sounds like, listen almost any evening at the top end of 75, on 3990-4000 to the German DRM station.  There is frequently a weaker, unidentified one on about 3960.  Obviously those things need to be coordinated very closely, since sharing with any other service would be impractical.  If the 40m SWBC stations all went to DRM, the band would be useless for amateur communication.  But I suspect many of the 3rd world broadcasters would balk at the idea, since many residents of those countries are lucky to be able to afford a small, simple analogue receiver capable of picking up only the strongest AM stations.

If the US gov't finds HF that crucial for strategic communications, why aren't they fighting BPL, instead of cheer leading for it?

There is a proposal to give amateurs more exclusive spectrum on 40m.  Since they say 4 to 10 mHz, I would assume this to mean there is no present threat to 75m.  I recall at the last WARC there was some lobbying from US and Canadian SW broadcasters to give them the top end of the band, 3950-4000 in Region 2.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
Sam KS2AM
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 710



WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2007, 11:36:05 PM »

re: 40 meters

7000-7100 is clear of broadcasters now
7100-7200 should be clear of broadcasters in March '09 according to the WRC-03 agreement
7200-7300 is up for discussion this year in WRC-07 and one of the proposals is to have the region 1&3 broadcasters vacate this area also, but this may not be an easy sell.

So things are looking up, but unfortunately there is nothing on the WRC-07 agenda so far to move the "No-Traffic Net" away from the AM calling frequency.   Wink
Logged

--- Post No Bills ---
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.066 seconds with 18 queries.