The AM Forum
December 02, 2025, 10:55:50 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Singer / Panoramic SPA-100 / RX-100 spectrum analyzer  (Read 4880 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8376



WWW
« on: July 24, 2009, 10:30:45 PM »

check this out..

I am trading for this good working Singer / Panoramic SPA-100 / RX-100 spectrum analyzer. It covers 10Mc to 40 Gc.

Anyone used one of these before?

I'm looking for the manuals on it. Probably avail online for a small fee. If anyone has one available for cheap/free of course.. hehe

I am trading some H/P logic analyzers. He may be getting the better deal, but what's a trade between friends?

This should help me see unwanted harmonics so I can make sure my TX are clean.

I already have an analyzer to cover 50Kc to 27.5Mc so I should be good to go.


* specan singer microwave1.jpg (337.04 KB, 1500x844 - viewed 571 times.)
Logged

Radio Candelstein
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2009, 08:21:47 AM »

Those early spec ans have pretty bad front ends.  Not sure about that one, but some (like the Tek 491) have shitloads of birdies and it's almost impossible to determine what's real and what's not.

Prolly a good trade vs logic analyzers, though  Grin
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
WQ9E
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3306



« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2009, 09:18:58 AM »

Those early spec ans have pretty bad front ends.  Not sure about that one, but some (like the Tek 491) have shitloads of birdies and it's almost impossible to determine what's real and what's not.


It just requires a little more "user input" to separate the real signals from the spurs Smiley  I used an old pair of Tek "1 Series" plug-ins for several years (1L10 and 1L20) and you differentiated the actual signals versus spurs by the direction and rate at which they moved across the screen when the center frequency was changed.  I picked up a Tek 7L13 a few years ago which is much easier to use.  The analyzers sure make it easy to align the old phasing rigs.

Pretty much any spectrum analyzer is better than no analyzer; modern analyzers definitely are easier and don't require as much skill to use (a slightly trained monkey will suffice for the current offerings).  Enjoy your new trade.

Rodger
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
K1ZJH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 298


« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2009, 08:54:27 PM »

Those early spec ans have pretty bad front ends.  Not sure about that one, but some (like the Tek 491) have shitloads of birdies and it's almost impossible to determine what's real and what's not.

Prolly a good trade vs logic analyzers, though  Grin
 

491 was great on two meters!! Tuneable IF was tuning in the opposite direction of the frontend
IIRC. Really neat trying to separate the fly poop from the pepper. Grin Grin
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8376



WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2009, 11:58:07 PM »

I tried it. it's easy to use. I don't mind the birdies, I am used to knowing what I am looking at in the aviary. I was aboe to tune it to see the sidebands on a 20MHz carrier and also up at 500Mhz, the limit of my 'good' signal generator. not bad for something that covers 10m to 40G. This in combination wih the MF-5+Vr-4b combo covering 50Kc to 27.5Mc should do for checking my outpoot harminicas.
Logged

Radio Candelstein
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries.