The AM Forum

THE AM BULLETIN BOARD => QSO => Topic started by: flintstone mop on November 20, 2006, 05:23:32 PM



Title: WOWO Radio
Post by: flintstone mop on November 20, 2006, 05:23:32 PM
Hello AMers
Maybe not a Ham topic BUT What wimpy station in New York bought WOWO and changed the clear frequency license to 10KW at night so they could run higher power in New York????? I know 45 watts probably doesn't go very far.
Fred


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 20, 2006, 07:27:15 PM
There is WLIB on 1190 in New York City...  They have long wanted to be a nighttime broadcaster, I think they wanted to move to 1200 after dark some years back.  But WOWO is so stong around NYC at night, even at 10KW they would have to go directional to make any difference.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W9GT on November 20, 2006, 07:28:55 PM
It was an "Urban R&B station"  in NYC, I don't know the call sign.  We were very sorry to hear about this happening to our prized gem of the airwaves.  WOWO is extremely steeped in tradition and has a fantastic history.  It has now been relegated to a P-W'er at night.  It still is 50KW in daytime, but only 10KW directional at night.

I went to a classic rock & roll show several years ago that had several of the original artists from the 50s and 60s.  Lou Cristie (spelling?)  was one of them (Lightnin's Strikin Again) and it was delight hearing him again.   Anyway, he said in his remarks during the show that he listened to WOWO all the time in Philadelphia at night back in the good old days, and when he heard his records being played on WOWO...........he knew he had made it!!!

WOWO ranked right up there with several of the other famous giant stations like WBZ, WLS, WLW, CKLW, XERF, KYW, etc etc.

By the way, Bob Seivers and Bob Chase of the original fab four are still alive!!  Bob Chase is over 80 and still on the air doing sports.   WOWO is now, of course, a talk radio station.

73,  Jack, W9GT
Fort Wayne, Indiana home of WOWO


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W9GT on November 20, 2006, 07:30:15 PM
Yes, WLIB, I think that is it.

73,  Jack, W9GT


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: N8LGU on November 20, 2006, 09:44:42 PM
I remember hearing something several years ago that the FCC did away with "clear channel" on AM Broadcast, WOWO was, of course, clear channel and was restricted to lower power at night so other stations could use that freq. BTW, I used to listen to WOWO at night after my local AM station signed off with my homebrew crystal radio. That was 1961!


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 20, 2006, 11:35:54 PM
I can believe that the FCC did that.  It's really getting bad on the old BCB at night.  It seems that there isn't a station that isn't fluttering with two other signals strongly audible on frequency,except the really local locals.

I remember much the same thing on the so-called "graveyard" channels back in the 60s, but there were a number of clear distant signals like WSL, WSB, WLW, WBZ, WOWO, WKBW, WABC, WMAQ, WJR, WBBM, CKLW (until some half-megawatt behemoth in Belize came on 800 KHz), etc.  You could sort of hear WOAI 1200 from Texas, but that was pretty weak up north, and the buzz and splash really chopped it up.  Man, I could drive all the way down to Delaware at night, and WABC was the only thing on 770.  Maybe it still is, but it seems that more and more, they're all getting to be graveyarders at night.  I guess it was only fair that they should all be unlistenable, instead of a few that you could hear.  Once in a while, I like to tune in Boston's WBZ down here near Washington, DC, and hear nothing else on the channel but a little splash from stations on the sides.  And there would be WHO on 1040 kind of weakly from Iowa, too.  WWVA 1070 from Wheeling used to blast in up on Long Island.  Man, it's Memory Lane in old Baconville tonight.  Remember classical music on AM from WQXR on 1560... "The Radio Station of the New York Times"?  It was so shortwavy that we got selective fading every night on LI.  WTOP-1500 is like that around DC, only they changed callsigns to WTWP now.  WBT 1110 in Charlotte.  Sigh.  Those were some days.

Of course, tuning a car radio is not as easy as twisting the tuning knob any more.  You press and hold a button now... it's just not the same.



Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 20, 2006, 11:46:29 PM
Bacon,

Remember when WGSM Huntington would shut down after critical hours, and CBL Toronto would come blasting in on 740 AM? They ran 50 KW on that clear channel frequency.

I have'nt heard CBL in years; any idea what happened to them?

Funny, I had a landline conversation with Eric, WB2CAU this evening and the subject of the BC-1F and the BC-5P at WGSM came up.

Hope all is well with you!

73,

Bruce, W2XR


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Mike/W8BAC on November 21, 2006, 06:30:58 AM
The licensed Clear Channel (high power 24/7) AM broadcasters are still in business. Here is a list of frequencies to listen for.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/amclearradiotable.html

Mike


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on November 21, 2006, 09:55:45 PM
1130 is now WBBR.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W9GT on November 22, 2006, 10:15:19 AM
Very interesting comments Phil.  Well, I think WOWO still does a lot to serve its midwestern largely conservative audience, however, it is certainly true that much of the programming is the sydicated stuff like Glen, and Rush, and the like.  Although those shows are very popular around here.  I will say also that there are some pretty highly-rated local news/talk shows during morning and evening drive times.  So there is still a major local influence.

It is shame, but certainly understandable from a business standpoint, that the tradition and historical significance of the truly great "clear channel" stations has somewhat gone by the wayside.  WOWO is hanging in there, but I'm sure there are many listeners that would love to see it restored to its former night-time power house status.

73,  Jack, W9GT


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Todd, KA1KAQ on November 22, 2006, 02:09:46 PM
I was just discussing this recently with someone. The memories of WO-WO and hearing them any night when tuning around the dial. Great signal and great jingles. No doubt my true love of radio started way back then, laying in bed at night in a room lit only by the glow of the tubes and dial, tuning around and listening to the country. WPTR in NY was a favorite in the high school years. Also remember WTIC(?) in Chicago? Picked that up easily on the car radio after getting my license and be let loose on the world. 

The parental units listened to WWVA, Wheeling West Virginia sometimes on the weekends. I remember being absolutely amazed that we could hear it on a Saturday afternoon. From way down the map, into out livingroom, no wires attached. Amazing stuff.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 22, 2006, 05:12:36 PM
Bacon,

Remember when WGSM Huntington would shut down after critical hours, and CBL Toronto would come blasting in on 740 AM? They ran 50 KW on that clear channel frequency.

I have'nt heard CBL in years; any idea what happened to them?

Funny, I had a landline conversation with Eric, WB2CAU this evening and the subject of the BC-1F and the BC-5P at WGSM came up.

Hope all is well with you!

73,

Bruce, W2XR

Hi Bruce,

Yes, the Toronto 50KW station on 740KHz used to ID as CBL, Toronto.  When I worked at WGSM 740 in Huntington, I double-checked frequency by turning on the exciter and listening to the beat against CBL.  The Toronto station is still on there, but evidently it IDs as CBC now.  I listen once in a while, it plays some old 1940 and 1950 classics.  It comes in very well around Washington DC at night.

I liked the BC1-F at WGSM.  It really sounded good, although I could see some curvature on the trapezoid pattern.  WGSM on omni with the BC1P was great!  I think that the three-tower directional array was OK, but the four-tower array that replaced it when they went 25KW daytime had some odd sidelobes, and on the north side of the beam, receivers really had to be tuned carefully for it to sound OK.  That four-tower array went up after some dopey kids cut the guys to one tower of the three-tower array (crashing the tower), and then got caught because their car wouldn't start.  They're lucky the tower didn't come down on top of them.  The four-tower array had a frequency-selective pattern to protect WACE 730 in Chiopee, Mass (I used to hear WACE come on the air in the early morning just before WGSM-740 back in the early 60s).  The antenna may have been changed since then, though.

The BC5-P at WGSM always sounded awful compared to the BC1-F.  The 5-P did not have nearly the clarity of the 1-P, and it was not as loud, because its audio phase distortion prevented the Volumax from controlling modulation peaks well.  I tried to modify the negative feedback on it to improve the audio - but it failed one day, and I got canned.  Oops... it was not mine to play with.  Gotta remember that.

I think it was Timtron who told me that the 5-P was really a 2.5KW transmitter that was pushed to run 5KW.  I can believe it.

When I worked at WGSM around 1970, they came on at dawn with 1KW non-directional, then a few hours later they went to 5KW directional with the three tower array.  It may be that the three-tower directional array with the phasing networks did not help the sound, but I don't think so.  I sneakily tried the BC1-P on the 3-tower array one day, and as I recall, it still sounded good.  The four-tower array and the 25KW transmitter sounded fine out along Long Island, but in northern Huntington off the beam, it wasn't so good.

WGSM was running some awful low-power during the nighttime back around the 1980s, but I couldn't hear it more than about a half mile away from the transmitter.  Maybe to the east (on the beam) it did better, but not much.  In the late 80s, I listened from Patchogue (out east, on the beam), and I could really tell when they kicked to high power directional in the morning!  What a difference!  Sounded good, too.

In the 90s it was bought by Radio Disney, and my mom complained about the splatter on WOR 710.  Then I think WHLI 1100 (Hempstead) bought it and used it as a more westerly outlet.  Maybe I have this sequence backwards.  I went to the transmitter site and looked at the towers, and I found one of the old abandoned concrete tower bases from the three tower array... wow, it was broken down.  That's when I began to realize how many years had gone by.

The last I heard, the 740 KHz station in Huntington, NY changed callsigns and went off the air except for some tests, but maybe someone bought it and put it back on the air.

 


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 22, 2006, 10:57:29 PM
Hi Bacon,

Wow, it's been a long time since we spoke! Good to hear from you! Interesting re CBL; yes, I have heard the music format you had mentioned on that frequency, but I had no idea it was coming from the former CBL.

I worked at WGSM-AM during summers between 1971 and 1973 when I was in college.  Jerry, WA2FNQ got me in there, and the CE at the time was Elliot Gross. I used do the inspections at the xmtr site in the morning and the switch-over from 1 KW ND, to 5 KW-D, along with any other xmtr and studio maintenance that was required. Don Huber, WB2UKA worked there at the same time as well, but Jerry, Elliot, and I did most of the engineering work.

For 17 year old ham with a 1st Phone, it was a really great job, even if I was paid minimum wage ($1.60 per hour) at the time! Hell, I would have worked there for free.!

I agree; the BC-1F sounded superior to the BC-5P. I attribute the great sound of the BC-1F to the P-P 845 class A driver with only 6 dB of negative feedback, driving the P-P class B 833As. The entire audio chain in that rig was all triode. The BC-5P used a quartet of EL-34s pentode-connected with unregulated screens in class AB1 with lots (around 20 dB) of negative feedback in an ill-fated attempt to linearize that mess. I agree, the 5 KW rig sounded horrible compared to the BC-1F.

I loved the sound of that BC-1F; so much so that when the BC-1F at WALK in Patchogue became available in 3/06, I parted it out. I took everything on the inside and outside of that rig with the sole exception of the cabinet. Too bad that that the xmtr building was extended around the rig, otherwise I would have taken it complete. It was a shame to part it out, but otherwise the CE was going to relegate the poor xmtr to the sad fate of the dumpster.

I am in the process of integrating the 845 driver deck from the WALK rig into my homebrew pair of 4-400As modulated by a pair of 833As. The 1200 VDC and 400 VDC power supply chassis has been drilled and punched and I should start assembly of this soon, along with a shunt regulated grid bias supply for the 833As.

I remember the BC-1F sounding like a really great sounding jukebox over the on-air monitor; very rich and full sounding, with extreme clarity (i.e low distortion)  in the transmitted audio; this is the sound I am attempting to emulate with  my rig once the 845 driver is integrated within the station.

I  don't recall the nonlinearity issue on the 'scope with the BC-1F. What were your thoughts as to the cause of this?

Jerry still has the dynamic presence equalizer that you built for WGSM. He was using it at one time, but I think it's sidelined currently.

I seem to recall the incident wherein you modified the feedback loop in the BC-5P, and being terminated by Elliot for this. In retrospect, I don't think modifying the global feedback around the modulator and driver in that rig would have helped what was bascially a lost cause in that xmtr.

I was at the xmtr site one morning when the BC-5P blew off the air. Someting had shorted in the 5600 VDC supply, but I can't remember the nature of the failure. I put the BC-1F on immediately until the the fault in the BC-5P was corrected.

Have you been on 75M lately? I can't recall the last time I heard you on.

Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family, Bob!

Best 73,

Bruce, W2XR


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 23, 2006, 12:46:55 AM
Oh man, that thing is still around?  It was a three-band compressor (bass, mids, treble) using 12AU7s balanced push-pull for gain control, if I recall.  I forget if I had transformers in the 12AU7 plates or not.  It all started when some political group put an ad on the station, and it sounded sooooooo muffled and bassy...  I decided that what was needed was dynamic EQ.  Also, I was trying to get the station to sound as loud as WCBS 880.

It is amazing that the thing even worked!  I think I used simple RC crossover filters on it, and it was really crude compared to what I was thinking of.  I tried it on the air, but when I asked Jim Ferguson how it sounded, he told me that it sounded compressed, and listening to it when he said that, I agreed.  I thought it sounded like the treble was too compressed.  I think I fiddled with the gain balancing, and then just put it aside.

Back then, I liked the old-fashioned compressed sound, because I could hear it working.  Years later when I worked in studio sound, I learned how wrong that was, and I started learning how to compress without the compression itself being noticeable.

I was on 75 a year ago, and it will probably be a few more years until I get on again.

Yep, they must have hired you after I got the boot.  I deserved it, no contest.  After that, I drove a school bus and roadied for a while, then I built video cameras with DUQ Bill and GKB Jesse, and Gabe.  Those were some years.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 23, 2006, 01:40:01 AM
Bacon,

I guess that was the Bruhns version of the Optimod-AM/multi-band audio processing! I seem to recall that the input xfmr in that thing was a UTC LS-10X, but I don't recall if the output was xfmr coupled. I guess it was, so as to maintain a balanced audio output to the xmtr audio input.

Any idea as to why the BC-1F exhibited the nonlinearity you described re the trap pattern on the 'scope???

73,

Bruce


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 24, 2006, 04:09:17 PM
Oh!  I forgot about that question.

It was a gradual curvature that slightly reduced the positive peaks.  I think it may have been caused by lack of modulation of the driver stage.  But I didn't know about such things back then, and I didn't check to see if the driver was modulated or not.  I think it was an 807 driving an 845 driving two 833as, and if the 845 was not modulated, it would have been a fairly stiff driver source (the relatively low plate Z of a triode).  Modulated triodes especially like more drive on mod peaks, but tetrodes and pentodes do too.  A tetrode or pentode driver would tend to produce more drive on positive peaks, because of their plate resistance, and the dynamics of PA control grid impedance with plate (and screen, if present) modulation.  A triode driver, with its lower plate resistance, would be stiffer, producing less voltage for the PA grid on positive modulation peaks than a high plate Z driver tube would.  (A lot of self-bias on the PA control grid helps, too.)

The effective source resistance of the modulator probably worked with the varying I/E ratio that this curvature would produce in the modulated stage, to reduce the overall distortion from this source a bit - the modulated B+ would swing a little higher on positive peaks because the impedance of the modulated stage was a little higher up there, and this would compensate for the curvature somewhat.  Negative feedback around the modulator would reduce that tendency, but it would reduce other distortion.

It was a soft, smooth curvature, so it wasn't the sort of thing that would sound harsh.  And probably the overall distortion actually worked with the typical upward curvature of receiver diode detector distortion, delivering better audio to the listener than perfect modulation would have done.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 24, 2006, 05:12:48 PM
Hi Bacon,

The BC-1F did not modulate the 813 driver stage, so I think you are right here; the curvature that you described may very well have been due to the lack of modulation applied to the driver.

BTW, the 845s were used as the audio driver, not the RF driver. Gates ran them in P-P class A with self-bias, and as I mentioned in an earlier post, I believe that the audio driver in that rig was in large part responsible for the great sound of that transmitter. I further believe that the BC-1F was the last Gates rig in the 250 thru 5000 watt class that used class A directly heated triodes as the audio driver. Probably too costly, especially in term of the massive 1250 VDC power supply design used in the BC-1F. Later rigs used 6L6s, 5881s, 807s, EL-34s, etc., (all beam power pentode tubes) with lots of negative feedback to linearize the driver. I think that as a result of all that feedback, slew induced distortion was probably an issue with those later rigs, whereas the BC-1F used only 6 dB of global feedback from the 833A plates to the triode-connected 6J7 cathodes. 6 dB is a very benign amount of inverse feedback with minimal audio artifacts, and triodes can get by with anywhere from zero to 8 dB of feedback typically.

Best 73,

Bruce


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 27, 2006, 01:28:15 PM
Hi Phil,

Thanks for the question!

No, I never worked there, but I literally grew up listening to that station on both AM and FM, as my folks were (and still are) enthusiasts of classical music.

If you  look up my call on QRZ.com, you'll see my reason for selecting this call under the "biography" section.

WQXR always had a reputation for the utmost professionalism in terms of programming quality, on-air talent, and their technical quality. In a sea of commercial radio broadcasting garbage, dominated in large part by the crass youth culture so prevelant here in the U.S., they are perhaps the last remaining bastion of good music in the New York metroplitan area.

73,

Bruce


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2JBL on November 27, 2006, 11:25:11 PM
the current 740KC in Huntington runs a pretty nice oldies and classic pop format. i'd listen to it more though if the audio wasn't SOOO bad. really distorted, baselining etc- it's absolutley putrid. good strong signal on my side of the Sound , but nasty bad audio. it's the only place i know where i can hear Patsy Kline, Ruth Brown and Buddy Holly on the same station... did i read a few posts back that the N.A.A.C.P driven owners of Inner City actually considered putting COUNTRY on WLIB after the Airhead America meltdown? i would have loved that, being a country fan, but everybody knows that listening to country music is in fact ILLEGAL in New York County, punishable under penalty of being labled a Cracker...


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W9GT on November 29, 2006, 11:03:59 AM
Here is a nice web site that shows WOWO transmitter(s):

http://www.j-hawkins.com/wowo.html

I pass by the WOWO studio site every day on my way to and from work.  It is now the location for one other AM station and three or four FM stations.  All owned now by Federated Media.  It was the location of WKJG-AM (5KW dir) and actually even the first location of WKJG-TV before the TV station moved to a new site with an 800' + tower back in 1954.  Now the TV station is WISE and it has combined with another TV station WPTA and they are running two network channels (ABC and NBC) from one studio location.  The old WKJG-TV studio site is up for sale.  WANE (CBS) and WFFT (FOX) are still on their own.  Lots and lots of changes to broadcast stations these days......it is all about money and getting the most bang for the buck.  The two TV channels that have combined forces have only one news organization between them.  They just call it Indiana's News Center to get away from specifically identifying it with either station's call sign.  Seems like we might be getting a bit short-changed that way by not having more choices, however, there is so much competition with the CATV networks for news that it is not the same ballgame any more.   ::) :)

73,  Jack, W9GT


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 29, 2006, 05:50:52 PM
Hi Chris (KD2XA) & Bacon,

Had to go into NY City today on business, and was able to finish up early and get back to the Huntington train station around 4PM. I decided to take a ride over to the former WGSM 740-AM xmtr site off of Wilton Road, since I had not been up there since probably 1975. Yes, I do have a life, but I was only 4 miles from the xmtr so I said what the heck. It's now WNYH Radio. Instead of the 3 tower DA when I worked there part-time back in the early 70's, it is now a 4-tower DA daytime only, and I seem to recall that when they transitioned over to the 4 tower array, the xmtr output was increased to either 25 or 50 KW from the original 5 KW. The site was really upgraded from the last time I was there, with a new & much larger xmtr building, well kept (i.e. mowed)  antenna field, etc. The houses in that area are incredible, essentially all mansions, and the 30+ acre antenna field  must be worth a fortune in Long Island real estate.

But the audio was horrid, as you had indicated in your previous post. Even 3 miles from the xmtr, the signal was 50 Khz wide due to hitting the baseline (no, my car radio was not overloaded at that distance), with no presence whatsoever in the audio, even with the NRSC pre-emphasis. You'd think that with modern audio processing gear from Orban, Omnia, etc., that overmodulation in the negative direction would be a thing of the past, but it goes to show the complete lack of technical excellence on behalf of the engineering staff of WNYH.

They signed off at 5 PM EST, and the Toronto 50 KW clear channel came booming in immediately on my car radio. What a difference in quality; clean, with well balanced response; obviously the technical staff at the Toronto station knew what they were doing. And with no selective fading over the 350+ mile path.

Interestingly, both stations have nearly the same format; 50s-60s oldies, etc.

Just figured I'd give you guys a glimpse of what the site and audio of the former WGSM-AM were like.

73,

Bruce



Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Bacon, WA3WDR on November 29, 2006, 08:11:33 PM
Hmmm, not good.  It's a shame that it's run so poorly.

I believe when they went with the four-tower array back around the 1980s, that station went to 25KW directional pointing out toward eastern Long Island during mid-day.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on November 29, 2006, 11:17:18 PM
Quote
In a sea of commercial radio broadcasting garbage, dominated in large part by the crass youth culture so prevelant here in the U.S.

Maybe so, but most stations are shooting for the 25-54 group, preferably the upper end of that group, since they spend the most money. Thus all the 60's oldies stations. Case in point:

Quote
Interestingly, both stations have nearly the same format; 50s-60s oldies, etc.


Kinda ironic that the generation that grew up deriding their parents and other old fuddy-duddies for listening to that "old" Big Band music are now themselves old fuddy-duddies listening to 40+ year old music (far older than Big Band was in the 50's and 60's).  ;)


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: KB2WIG on November 30, 2006, 01:39:23 AM
...........  beat me daddy    ...........   


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: WA3VJB on November 30, 2006, 12:21:12 PM
So somebody explain to me why "WKBW" abandoned their doo-wop, pre-1965 Oldies format after about a year's time?

Are folks for that genre "too old"  or what?

Let me take you back to last year at about this time, 50,000 Watts, with our own W2KBW:
[/color]


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Todd, KA1KAQ on November 30, 2006, 12:45:14 PM
There was a station in NY that played Big Band music back in the late 90s, somewhere around 1560. I think it might have been WQEW, but I could be wrong. Disney ended uo buying them and turned it into a child's station with tunes from Disney movies.

Then I discovered 830 WCRN Worcestor/Framingham playing Big Band music, so I felt better. A coupla years back, they changed to a moldy-oldies format, which just didn't give the push-pull audio on the SX-28 or -62 the same workout. Now they're a talk radio format.

Does there exist anywhere, a webpage or list of AM stations still playing Big Band Classics, Oldies, and so on? I recall discussing this years ago with someone on QTH.net to build a users list, but it never came together.

I did hear on the news recently that XM (maybe it was Sirrius) wasn't doing so well with subscriptions. Maybe there's still hope for the traditional AM stations?


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Jim KF2SY on November 30, 2006, 03:12:11 PM
Todd,
I found this website that can do any kind of radio station/format search you wish.
here is a quick search for US AM stations only that have an oldies format.


http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/finder?call=&band=AM&freq=&freq_exact=Yes&city=&state=&country=u&format=old&owner_search=starts&owner=&scope=&count=20&is_lic=Y&is_cp=Y&is_unl=Y&is_ful=Y&is_lp=Y&sort=Call&sr=1&sid=

Jim


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2JBL on November 30, 2006, 09:20:14 PM
KB2WIG- don't know your name, but i believe that's "beat me Daddy eight to the bar", as in boogie, right? Bruce- maybe one of yoooze guys in the broadcast biz could get ahold of the techs at 740 in Huntington and get that audio straightened out with a nice and friendly call or Email? it's a damn shame hearing it like that. my old Ranger/linear setup on 1610 back in the day had a way better air sound than that and i'm only a two way guy...that 740 signal looks like a CB rig on the 'scope!
Phil- i'm cool with Gospel back on WLIB. they are doing a great lineup of artists and the audio is good. country would have been nice though, and it's not just a white guy's format. do you have any idea how many transplanted southern black folks around here like country too? it might surprise you to know that those people buy moonshine (easily found in NYC) and listen to country, but they really do.


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W2XR on November 30, 2006, 10:04:19 PM
Hi Chris,

I'm not in the broadcasting business, but listening to the terrible audio of WNYH 740-AM certainly does tempt me to call the station and offer my services in getting the xmtr, etc., straightened out there. Plus I think it would be great fun to work at a commercial AM BC station on a very part-time basis (such as weekends only), especially since the rig there is a big 50 KW xmtr throttled back to 25 KW output. It's something I have'nt done since the early '70s when I worked at that stations predecessor, WGSM-AM, summers while going to college.

It's really a shame; the station sounds awful, but the program content is really great, with Patsy Cline, Roy Orbison, the Skyliners, among other 50's-60's rock and country artists featured. Another station here on Long Island that plays great music, but of a different genre is piss-weak 1 KW daytime-only WALK-AM, 1370; they play a lot of jazz, big band and show tunes; music that I would'nt be caught dead listening to 25 years ago, but that I really enjoy and collect now. Incredible talent such as Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Dinah Washington, Etta James, et al,  really are wonderful to listen to after all!!! In agreement with the HUZ-man, my folks were right; that is great and timeless music, and in my middle age I have acquired and love their listening tastes. BTW, the old Gates BC-1F from WALK-AM, where so much of that music emanated from, is now reincarnated and recycled as part of the W2XR xmtr.

I've got the feeling that in the broadcast engineering field nowadays, there is no such thing as "very part-time" work, and I have a very full-time job in a completely different aspect of the electronics industry. I'm sure that Phil, K2PG can comment on this.

73,

Bruce


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: W4WSZ on December 02, 2006, 07:15:09 PM
Back in 1969, I built a KW station here in North Florida on 1090 kc.  We were daytime only in order to protect KAAY, Little Rock, Ark.   We thought we were big time protecting the 50 KW GIANT.

As you say......those were the days when commercial radio was fun.

73,

Bob,W4WSZ


Title: Re: WOWO Radio
Post by: Tim WA1HnyLR on December 08, 2006, 11:30:50 AM
Quote from: Bacon, WA3WDR link=topic=9036.msg67024#msg67024


date=1164233556
Bacon,

Remember when WGSM Huntington would shut down after critical hours, and CBL Toronto would come blasting in on 740 AM? They ran 50 KW on that clear channel frequency.

I have'nt heard CBL in years; any idea what happened to them?

Funny, I had a landline conversation with Eric, WB2CAU this evening and the subject of the BC-1F and the BC-5P at WGSM came up.

Hope all is well with you!

73,

Bruce, W2XR

Hi Bruce,

Yes, the Toronto 50KW station on 740KHz used to ID as CBL, Toronto.  When I worked at WGSM 740 in Huntington, I double-checked frequency by turning on the exciter and listening to the beat against CBL.  The Toronto station is still on there, but evidently it IDs as CBC now.  I listen once in a while, it plays some old 1940 and 1950 classics.  It comes in very well around Washington DC at night.

I liked the BC1-F at WGSM.  It really sounded good, although I could see some curvature on the trapezoid pattern.  WGSM on omni with the BC1P was great!  I think that the three-tower directional array was OK, but the four-tower array that replaced it when they went 25KW daytime had some odd sidelobes, and on the north side of the beam, receivers really had to be tuned carefully for it to sound OK.  That four-tower array went up after some dopey kids cut the guys to one tower of the three-tower array (crashing the tower), and then got caught because their car wouldn't start.  They're lucky the tower didn't come down on top of them.  The four-tower array had a frequency-selective pattern to protect WACE 730 in Chiopee, Mass (I used to hear WACE come on the air in the early morning just before WGSM-740 back in the early 60s).  The antenna may have been changed since then, though.

The BC5-P at WGSM always sounded awful compared to the BC1-F.  The 5-P did not have nearly the clarity of the 1-P, and it was not as loud, because its audio phase distortion prevented the Volumax from controlling modulation peaks well.  I tried to modify the negative feedback on it to improve the audio - but it failed one day, and I got canned.  Oops... it was not mine to play with.  Gotta remember that.

I think it was Timtron who told me that the 5-P was really a 2.5KW transmitter that was pushed to run 5KW.  I can believe it.

When I worked at WGSM around 1970, they came on at dawn with 1KW non-directional, then a few hours later they went to 5KW directional with the three tower array.  It may be that the three-tower directional array with the phasing networks did not help the sound, but I don't think so.  I sneakily tried the BC1-P on the 3-tower array one day, and as I recall, it still sounded good.  The four-tower array and the 25KW transmitter sounded fine out along Long Island, but in northern Huntington off the beam, it wasn't so good.

WGSM was running some awful low-power during the nighttime back around the 1980s, but I couldn't hear it more than about a half mile away from the transmitter.  Maybe to the east (on the beam) it did better, but not much.  In the late 80s, I listened from Patchogue (out east, on the beam), and I could really tell when they kicked to high power directional in the morning!  What a difference!  Sounded good, too.

In the 90s it was bought by Radio Disney, and my mom complained about the splatter on WOR 710.  Then I think WHLI 1100 (Hempstead) bought it and used it as a more westerly outlet.  Maybe I have this sequence backwards.  I went to the transmitter site and looked at the towers, and I found one of the old abandoned concrete tower bases from the three tower array... wow, it was broken down.  That's when I began to realize how many years had gone by.

The last I heard, the 740 KHz station in Huntington, NY changed callsigns and went off the air except for some tests, but maybe someone bought it and put it back on the air.

 some years back there was a devastating fire at the WGSM transmitter site. Many years later when I was working for Armstrong transmitter a crusty burnt Harris MW50 showed up It was WGSMs transmitter. It was to be fixed up as a 20Kw transmitter to go to Brazil. The 4CX35000 modulator and PA tube were replaced with 4CX15000 tubes. The industial voltage in South America is 360v 3 phase . That worked well with the oil filled plate transformer that was designed for 440-480 3 phase being that the needed  B+ required was about 18-19Kv . It took a whole summer to rebuild it. The panel meters were melted out of the panels along with the wiring harness.It was a long process. The end result was a very efficient 20Kw transmitter. 20 kw is a popular power assignment in Central and Southe  America. I imagine the transmitter still lives to this day  a monument to WGSM   .But I do have one piece of my own. A somewhat scorched Delta OIB-1 rackmount impedance bridge. Allan Weiner has it now . I need it to measure tower base impedance. Allan has a 4Kw daytimer on 710Khz which has a CP to 780Khz at a full 5Kw with 60 watts nitetime power. I am rebuilding the old RCA 5F for service using brick shithouse technology. Perhaps a digital photo presentation when completed. It is too bad that the Clear Channel AM broadcast channels have gone the way they have. I did like WLIBs island music format that they had before air amerika came along. also the demise of WWKB when they dumped their nostalgia rock format in favor of another insipid talk format. Oh well such is life in the slowlane of broacasting. De TimWA1HnyLR
AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands