Title: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WBear2GCR on May 07, 2020, 05:49:14 PM Well,
I wrongly assumed that I actually had some of these HN connectors in a drawer somewhere. Not. :( I picked up a nice DowKey 310 vacuum coax switch, but oops, those are not N connectors!! Takes 3 type HN... Now what? Well, I checked epay for some, and they seem to think they're made of pure silver or something... wondering what to do now! No reason to pay 5x the cost of the relay for the connectors. Just plain silly to do that. Any help out there? :-\ _-_-bear Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on May 07, 2020, 06:28:42 PM Well, I wrongly assumed that I actually had some of these HN connectors in a drawer somewhere. Not. :( I picked up a nice DowKey 310 vacuum coax switch, but oops, those are not N connectors!! Takes 3 type HN... Now what? Well, I checked epay for some, and they seem to think they're made of pure silver or something...wondering what to do now! No reason to pay 5x the cost of the relay for the connectors. Just plain silly to do that. Any help out there? _-_-bear You can ask yourself: how do they mount the existing connectors on the Dow Key? Can I remove them and mount connectors that fit my pocketbook status? Type "HN" connectors generally are expensive. Here's a link to the Dow Key catalog with the 310 information: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=2ahUKEwikvJX_5aLpAhUjl3IEHcKhCEsQFjAEegQIARAB&url=http%3A%2F%2F67.225.133.110%2F~gbpprorg%2Fmil%2Fphotoanglo%2FDowKeyCatalogPart4.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0BScvyXdJVCxJ3CNaze1CM Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WD5JKO on May 07, 2020, 07:40:16 PM RF Parts have some. I've used these at work, and they work well at 3KW, and using RG-393 Coax: https://www.rfparts.com/pe4182.html $32.95 each! Jim Wd5JKO Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: W1NB on May 07, 2020, 07:44:23 PM I don’t have anything with HN connectors so I can’t test this but the outer threaded sleeve looks like it might be the same size and thread as an SO-239. If it is, you can probably use a PL-259 with a cut-off center pin that mates by compression to the center pin of the HN. The return loss of the connector will be effected but if it’s for HF it probably won’t hurt.
Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WBear2GCR on May 07, 2020, 08:30:42 PM I don’t have anything with HN connectors so I can’t test this but the outer threaded sleeve looks like it might be the same size and thread as an SO-239. If it is, you can probably use a PL-259 with a cut-off center pin that mates by compression to the center pin of the HN. The return loss of the connector will be effected but if it’s for HF it probably won’t hurt. Yeah... it would be easier to just find 3 at a hamfest in a box!! ;) I'll double check it, but to my eyes the threads looked different and the diameter of the HN larger... there may still be a kludge scheme. Doubtful though. Pete, I opened one side it was the connections to the switched contacts, soldered and potted under some really nice clear silicone material. Guess if everything else fails I will have to open the top side and remove that plate, slightly more complicated... and see what there is to see. Never really ran into these connectors before in person. _-_-bear Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: K4NYW on May 08, 2020, 10:11:12 AM I found three used HN plugs (UG-59E/U) in my junkbox - you'll need to clean out the old cable.
FTGH - Is your mailing address good on QRZ? Nick Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WBear2GCR on May 08, 2020, 12:18:12 PM I found three used HN plugs (UG-59E/U) in my junkbox - you'll need to clean out the old cable. FTGH - Is your mailing address good on QRZ? Nick Wow! Sending you email... Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WD8BIL on May 09, 2020, 07:44:35 AM This is a great group of guys!
Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Tom WA3KLR on May 16, 2020, 04:24:02 PM Perhaps a little late, but I found I had a 1965 Amphenol 3-ring binder catalog in my files.
Attached is the HN family page: Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: VE7RF on May 18, 2020, 03:07:35 PM Never seen a HN connector. They appear to be rated at 5 kv. Is there any other advantage of a HN connector vs a 7-16 DIN connector ?
Typ 7-16 din connectors appear to be rated at aprx 2.7 kv to 2.9 kv rms...so maybe add 41% to obtain peak V. I did come across a 7-16 chassis connector that necks down at the back end...so it will fit the hole pattern of a SO-239 and also a type N. I gave up on type N's years ago.... and swapped to 7-16 dins... since they are readily available for any size coax. Jim VE7RF Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on May 18, 2020, 03:41:29 PM For typical amateur radio HF/VHF use I see no advantage to HN or Type 7-16 connectors. UHF, BNC, and N connectors would work fine and you typically don't have to go to the bank and get a loan to pay for them.
Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WD5JKO on May 18, 2020, 04:21:38 PM For typical amateur radio HF/VHF use I see no advantage to HN or Type 7-16 connectors. UHF, BNC, and N connectors would work fine and you typically don't have to go to the bank and get a loan to pay for them. RF Parts sells them for $32.95 each. See my post earlier. That might be more then the average Bear wants to pay, but that should not require remortgaging the house. Many that say things like that might also have the latest $5000 plastic radio in front of them along with the matching amplifier. ;D Jim Wd5JKO Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: W1ITT on May 18, 2020, 04:28:38 PM As pointed out, the HN's big advantage over the Type N is its voltage rating. The only time I have used HNs in the ham shack is to bring B-plus from a power supply cabinet to the RF deck. I have Ns and UHFs everywhere but I used the HN because it would prevent me, in a momentary lapse of my usual keen intellect, from plugging 5 KV into someplace it didn't belong.
But out in the wide world, for low and medium power RF, it's mostly N, 7-16 DIN and UHF for "small" connectors. In all the communications and broadcast sites I've been at worldwide, I can't recall ever seeing an HN in use. But it's under control, because I have adapters! 73 de Norm W1ITT Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: WD5JKO on May 18, 2020, 05:30:25 PM I use the HN's almost every day in the Semiconductor industry. I add a photo of one on a 3KW 13.56 Mhz RF amplifier.
That cable connector is one from RF Parts. The Coax is RG-393. Jim Wd5JKO Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on May 18, 2020, 06:11:51 PM RF Parts sells them for $32.95 each. See my post earlier. That might be more then the average Bear wants to pay, but that should not require remortgaging the house. Many that say things like that might also have the latest $5000 plastic radio in front of them along with the matching amplifier. ;D Ya, but my connectors only cost typically $5 to $10 a piece. $100 for three connectors is not something I would enjoy. :D But a $5K plastic radio I would be happy with.Jim Wd5JKO Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Tom WA3KLR on May 18, 2020, 06:21:30 PM I worked at a high voltage DC company about 12 years ago. They were using RG-58 coax up to around 22,000 Vdc and RG-8 coax up around 100,000 Vdc as I recall. The dielectric rating plummets with ac. These are the solid dielectric coax as I recall.
For a connector with the RG-8 at the high voltages, the SO-239 shell was used and the dielectric and center conductor went on in to a in-house designed mating connector to the center conductor of the coax which had a soldered hemispherical button on the end. The other end of the coax was a pigtail. For the RG-58 use, I don't remember. For ham use with voltages up to 5000 Volts dc, the standard rf connectors may do. Just don't get the antenna and dc supply cable mixed up! Next question, so what is the ratings for the BNC, SO-239, and PL-259? Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: Tom WA3KLR on May 18, 2020, 06:32:22 PM Again, from my 1965 Amphenol catalog, the BNC and UHF family pages. The voltage ratings are the same for the two.
Someone will have to do a hi-pot experiment with the regular connectors and coax, find the breakdown and de-rate. Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: KD6VXI on May 18, 2020, 08:42:13 PM After my experience with 6kv to the back of the hand, I only use these
https://www.ebay.com/itm/201428258351 15 bucks for more than one. And it can't be confused with a bnc. They make higher voltage ones, but I've used these 5kv connectors at twice that. --Shane KD6VXI Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: VE7RF on May 19, 2020, 11:28:38 AM For typical amateur radio HF/VHF use I see no advantage to HN or Type 7-16 connectors. UHF, BNC, and N connectors would work fine and you typically don't have to go to the bank and get a loan to pay for them. It depends what the application is. For larger coax, like LMR-1200/1700 DB, 7/8" and bigger heliax, the only 2 x connectors readily available are Type N.... and 7-16 DIN...pick one. Andrew stopped making UHF connectors for 7/8 heliax a long time ago, in the mid 90's. If you have ever seen a type N on large coax, it looks pretty silly, with this huge connector...and puny bnc sized center pin. The 7-16 Din connectors on the large coax/heliax don't cost anymore than a type N. You are correct though, good quality, silver plated/teflon dielectric UHF connectors are ample for most applications, like 1/2" heliax / LMR-600DB..and smaller diameter cables. Jim VE7RF Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: W7TFO on May 19, 2020, 11:47:37 AM I used to build with HN's in the past, but have switched over to 7-16 DIN's
Available cheap, in every configuration imaginable, and will actually tighten up fine without a wrench. A helluva lot safer than those miserable Millen jobs, too. Easier on my ham-fists anyway. 73DG Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: VE7RF on May 19, 2020, 12:04:03 PM I used to build with HN's in the past, but have switched over to 7-16 DIN's Way back, I decided to embark on this massive type N conversion program..which did not work out too good, the issue being captivated, and non captivated pins..which I had overlooked. I also looked at LC connectors, including surplus, but then found differences in center conductor diam between the old 52 ohm RG-17..and the newer 50 ohm RG-218... the 2 are not compatible for the most part. A LC connector is a huge..(and expensive) connector..and was starting to go out of vogue in the mid-late 90's..are were not readily available for a lot of coax /heliax at the time.Available cheap, in every configuration imaginable, and will actually tighten up fine without a wrench. A helluva lot safer than those miserable Millen jobs, too. Easier on my ham-fists anyway. 73DG Fast forward a bit (I worked for the telco for 34 years)...and noticed at some of the cell sites I looked after (alarms + misc stuff only), our competition, ( who shared some sites, with their own eq + ants on our tower's) were starting to use 7-16 Dins. The 7-16 din seemed like an ideal connector, with the huge center pin..and the flange on the female chassis connector, was not much bigger than a SO-239. So made the decision to swap everything to 7-16 Dins. The xcvr's,and small stuff is still UHF though..... everything else, including remote ant switches, several hb amplifiers, watt meters, lightning arrestors, hb baluns etc are all din. Jim VE7RF Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: KD6VXI on May 19, 2020, 02:25:50 PM And if 7 16 din isn't big enough, they do make bigger.
And they make smaller. I have both LC and 7/16 in the shop. LC into the dummy load, but 7/16 on the output of the amplifiers for 3cx3000 and above. UHF on all 500z and 8877 class. Good to see ya Jimbo. --Shane KD6VXI Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: VE7RF on May 19, 2020, 05:05:04 PM And if 7 16 din isn't big enough, they do make bigger. And they make smaller. I have both LC and 7/16 in the shop. LC into the dummy load, but 7/16 on the output of the amplifiers for 3cx3000 and above. UHF on all 500z and 8877 class. Good to see ya Jimbo. --Shane KD6VXI Hi Shane. They still make an even bigger DIN..called a 13-30. But it's hard to find..and out of vogue. Anything bigger than a 7-16 Din....and then you are into standard series of EIA flange connectors, starting with 7/8"..and at least 4 more sizes bigger, but that's for broadcast stuff. The 7-16 is plenty big enough (and affordable) for tubes like a 3CX-3000A7 /6000A7 / YC-156 / YC-243. Buddy bought some blown cell site lightning arrestors, dirt cheap, like $3.00 each. Small al box, with a female 7-16 on each end..with gas discharge tube inside the box. They just toss em. At the time, it was a cheap source of chassis female 7-16 dins. I'm still working on the new 5700/7700 B+ supply project, but this CV-19 has bogged down some projects. Also just got 100 x 330 uf @450 vdc lytics (Rubycom) from digikey... + 8 x HV boards from Harbach (2 boards per L4PS). 8 x ameritron chimney's still on back order from Ameritron...( and also 12 dpst vac relays, also from ameritron). My 4 x ebm papst blowers did arrive, from digikey. Same ones as used in the AL-1500 amps.... but I got the 230 vac version. Drake L4B blowers now removed. Hydraulic green lee punch, 75mm, new hole in back of each L4B RF deck. Ends up with double the airflow vs oem. (better for AM etc). I'm way OT, still don't know if I will just hard wire the B+ on the new B+ supply..to external C-L-C box.... then yet another B+ cable to 2 x HB RF decks.... or use some kind of HV connectors (not a millen !). This new supply is dangerous enough as is. I'm leaning towards plane RG-213U..with braid cut back a good 2-3" at each end.... then a crimped stakon (+ soldered) on the center conductor. Then cu strap wrapped, pinched, and soldered to the braid..... and other end of strap machine screwed to chassis somewhere... same deal at other end of same HV cable. Then use those circular compression rubber devices, forget what they are called, u tighten em up... and their ID reduces a bunch, ultimate strain relief..at each end of HV cable. This would be the simplest, safest route. Then maybe wrap RED electrical tape around the 213-U... every few inches to signify it's B+. I also installed a B+ voltmeter in the B+ supply, and also the C-L-C box..and also both HB RF decks. Then IF the B+ fuse (BUSS HVU-3) blew open in the RF deck, HV meter in RF deck would drop to zero..... but still read 5700/7700 in the B+ supply (and C-L-C box). IF both hv meters read zero... then I know asap, the HV fuse #2 opened off ( HV fuse #2 is wired between sec of dahl xfmr..and diode board, (in series with just one leg of sec). I got hit with 4 kv, threw me across the room..back in 1976, no HV meter ! That plus ur getting nailed with 6 kv months ago..with a millen, freaks me out....esp with a 253 lb dahl + strings of 10,000uf lytics. Later... Jim VE7RF Title: Re: What about "HN" Coax Connectors?? Post by: KD6VXI on May 19, 2020, 08:08:40 PM Jimbo, AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
I've seen the 13 30 DIN. It's a monsterous connector. But I still like my LC (and they make a VERY similar LC connector type. That's actually whats on my dummy load. I bought an LC from Matt in NYC, turned out it wasn't. He was cool, took it back and replaced it with the correct for the same price. Only difference was center pin in reality.). But as you say, they are coming out of vogue. The LC was what was used on the 3 tube I sent you pics of back in January. It's also what is on the ends of my 1 5/8. Look at the HV connector I posted above. As I've said, I've used it to near 10KV before. I don't trust it's ability to be held in an open hand at that level. At 5KV and below, it's said you can hold it in your hand and not have a problem one with it arcing to you. Yeah, I'm not going to test that "feature". My buddy with the huge power supply I sent you pics of is using the big version of that connector. The cool thing about MHV is they install just like a BNC connector. Takes me about 5 minutes to do the male and female side. Another one is the old spark plug connection. It will take way more voltage than we use. And the shielded spark plug wire makes really good HV wire. I ran into a bunch of gas discharge wire that is shielded when I was junking the neon signs in a Target store. It's about the same size as RG-8. I believe on _amps_ reflector someone had mentioned the typical rating of RG stuff is at AC frequencies. I dunno, I bought 6KV rated RG59 from ChiCom from the same guy I bought the SHV connectors from. Fits perfect. He also sells complete assemblies, you can find him on Ebay. They also make SHV10k and SHV20k connectors. https://www.rbdinstruments.com/blog/high-voltage-connector-types/ Rebuilding the L4s eh? I've always had a soft spot for that amp. I've had quite a bit of lag on some of the stuff I ordered from ChiCom. To the point of the companies just refunded my money..... Two / three weeks later item shows up. People in China just said keep it, and please order from us again. They just write it off. My Dahl is nowhere near that big... I'm in the 160 lb range. It still does 5 plus A peak. You must have finally read my email about K1JJ audio filter. I tell ya, if you look at his posts, as well as the others in that thread, that does some amazing things without having to have a complete rack of crap. Sorry about the OT bandwith everyone. --Shane KD6VXI |