Title: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 02:04:50 AM I am not sure if this has been covered in the past on AMfone but a local AMer mentioned this mod. A friend came over and we built two of these ALC boxes. They work quite well.
We used cheap radio shack plastic project boxes and 1 meg pots. I slapped resistor across the pot to lower it to 500K. We used 9 volt batterys. These things take 10 minutes to build. Remember that you are applying NEGATIVE voltage to the ALC jack on the Icom. The Center pin of the RCA is the negative lead and the outside of the RCA gets the positive lead. You set the RF power full up. Then adjust the carrier using the pot on your new alc box. I chose 25 watts. Now you can turn up your audio and the radio never pulls back the power. The audio doubles out of the rig. I can hit 100% mod now now problem from 25 watts. Pretty cool little project and no need to open radio up. We have tried this on 751, 735, 725 and 756Pro. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Ralph W3GL on September 26, 2010, 02:11:27 AM Just curious, didn't that mod box also apply to the Kenwood TS940 as well? I could be wrong but I seem to remember something along that line being published here some time ago. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 02:40:04 AM It may have been posted here. I have been here a few years and cant remember it. Its new to me so I posted it. It should work on any solid state transciever that pulls back the carrier when modulated on AM. My FT450 for example does not do this so its not needed. My FT1000D does pull back a bit but carefull setting of the knobs and you do not need it. Most icoms are horrible on AM and really yank the power back if you try to run any audio at all.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on September 26, 2010, 03:34:54 AM Nothing new. As Ralph points, this info has been floating around for almost 30 years. Kenwood first introduced this circuit concept for external applying of an ALC voltage to their TS-820 and TS-830 for reducing power output on SSB when driving linears.
It's also been discussed and pointed out in several threads here in the AMfone's Online AM Handbook > MODERN RIGS. The last time was in June 2010, http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=24495.0 Actually most current (within the last 10 to 15 years) Icoms produce very decent AM. A good read and insight on Icom DSP type rigs on AM can be found here. More on AM in Icom DSP-based transceivers (http://www.ab4oj.com/icom/dsp_am.html) The same circuit you attached (right down to "P1") is also shown here under Icom IC-756: http://www.ipass.net/wb4iuy/radio/wb4iuy2l.htm Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 11:26:44 AM So far this is really working nicely. It really fixes the icoms. I got some emails from a guy who just tried it on his Kenwood and he can now hot 100% mod in the AM mode.
Good deal! C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1AEX on September 26, 2010, 12:27:26 PM I played around with this when using my Pro III on AM last spring. It's worth doing as it does remove the gritty artifacts that the internal ALC seems to produce. I could never modulate mine much beyond 90% though. Adjusting the R2229 pot (AM Modulation) indicated that it simply runs out of headroom when you attempt to go higher.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqQl_Ks8qnM For better or worse, I have a few notes on using the Pro III on AM at the link below. I have pretty much abandoned using it on AM simply because of the bandwidth limitations imposed by the DSP on AM (2.9kc + 2.9kc = 5.8kc total = often difficult experience for the guy on the other end) and have assigned it to digital and cw duties where it really does excel. http://www.w1aex.com/756AM/756AM.html Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 01:18:32 PM The videos of the watt meter really tell the tale of this little device. Where you using the Icom power supply in your test? It wont allow the radio to go to 100% mod in the AM mode with external ALC. switched to the Astron 35M and it easily got there.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1AEX on September 26, 2010, 01:32:41 PM I also use an Astron 35M with mine. Some users I have talked to have found their Pro series rigs seem to be able to reach 100% while others don't reach much beyond 90% which indicates that other factors are probably at work. It could be variations in alignment settings or production runs. That being said, I don't recall getting complaints about the audio level being too low once I started using the simple external ALC circuit. It really is a very simple, cheap, and effective project for anyone who plans to use one of these rigs on AM.
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 01:34:57 PM Mine is an old 756Pro. So maybe that is why. Anything past 80 is gravy anyways. I dont plan on using the Icom on AM much. But its sure nice to be able to turn it on and ask a question or talk to a Friend real fast while the big rig is down for service.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: WB2EMS on September 26, 2010, 11:36:00 PM I've considered trying this on my 706MKIIG. Not so much for the AM modulation, though it will probably help that rig also because the ALC mucks with the AM on that rig too, but to fix the key up overshoot. In various modes, including AM, even if you have the power output set lower to drive an amp, it seems to initially key up at near full output and then taper down. Not good when you only need 5-10 watts and more will abuse the grids of the tubes in the amp. Anyone using this circuit observed if it helped with that?
I'll have to give it a try. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 26, 2010, 11:39:23 PM I dont see any overshoot on my rig. Give it a shot. Its a 10 minute build. Just get an old RCA cable, Cut it and wire it up to a 9 volt and 500K or what ever pot you have. You will need -1 to -2 volts for most radios.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: flintstone mop on September 27, 2010, 11:15:46 AM Even though the mod is 'old hat' I found it to be quite interesting that they use ALC approach to control carrier.
A former TS440 was modified for hi-fi AM by disabling the power limit control to allow more pos peaks. Schwang the munky!! It was huge audio BTW!! Still had to set the carrier power to 25W. So will the ALC approach give the same results of big positive peaks.........like 125%? FRED Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1AEX on September 27, 2010, 12:07:23 PM Anyone using this circuit observed if it helped with that? Kevin, I have a little Yaesu FT-897D that exhibits the same overshoot problem you described. With that rig, the external ALC resolves the issue very nicely. Give it a shot! Rob W1AEX Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 27, 2010, 12:16:16 PM We did on the air testing last night. The audio doubles with this in line. The 735 will make the full 100 watts from a 25 carrier.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: WD8BIL on September 27, 2010, 03:46:39 PM Yup, that worked on my IC718. With audio into the balanced modulator input I had no trouble doing 100% mod with a trilite 40 amp power suckply!
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: ke7trp on September 27, 2010, 05:54:03 PM Spent more time on the air last night with my friends 735 and this box. He sounded really good with it.
C Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: K4IMZ on October 01, 2010, 07:34:24 PM Interesting topic... will this work on the IC-761 and it's DSB "simulated" AM ?
at least I think I remember that is has some kind of AM workaround. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: w3jn on October 02, 2010, 07:26:03 AM DSB "simulated" AM ??? DSB+carrier=AM (in fact even SSB is AM). Doesn't matter how it's arrived at - plate/collector modulation, balanced modulator, or DSP - it's not simulated at all ;D Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W3SQE on January 31, 2011, 06:58:10 PM Hi Everyone:
I built one today at work. I used a 6 AA holder and a 500K pot. I verified the proper polarity,center negative, and preset it to 2V as someone recommended. When I plug it into my 735 and transmit however the RF out goes away all together. My meter will read 40 watts out on max RF power but when I plug in "the mod" and key up it sits at zero and another radio I have then receives no carrier just some noise. I tried other voltages and the same result: no power out. Any thoughts? Oh by the way I find that I can get the Icom to work well on AM by turning off the compressor , reducing the mic gain to about 25 percent and watching the power meter during transmission. If I avoid over modulation the power meter moves forward as I speak. If the gain is too high and I speak loudly you can see the meter deflect backwards as the ALC or something kicks in. Earl Thomas Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: K5WLF on January 31, 2011, 09:14:36 PM Anyone using this circuit observed if it helped with that? Kevin, I have a little Yaesu FT-897D that exhibits the same overshoot problem you described. With that rig, the external ALC resolves the issue very nicely. Give it a shot! Rob W1AEX Looks like time for me to build one of those gadgets, since I too have an FT-897D. ldb K5WLF Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KL7OF on January 31, 2011, 09:24:00 PM Does the Yaesu FT 102 respond to the alc voltage mod? I am using mine to drive an amp on AM and I can't seem to use more than about 175ma drive before the audio make the needle go the wrong way...My rig has the overshoot mod done, but something has changed as the overshoot on keyup has returned...
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Steve - K4HX on January 31, 2011, 10:46:11 PM There is an internal ALC mod for AM. I can't remember or dig up the specifics, but it involved changing one resistor to reduce the ALC action. Or you would probably just be better off removing the ALC. It's not needed on AM and on SSB it can cause splatter.
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Opcom on February 01, 2011, 01:29:08 AM In any case the dongle works well and kept me from getting rid of the 735's. Thanks!
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W3DBB on February 01, 2011, 10:57:01 AM .
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KD6VXI on February 02, 2011, 03:01:11 PM I've built the same circuit here, and use it on my Yahoo 857 at the house.
Works fine. The thing to watch is polarity... Yeasu is negative, other radios (may) be positive going? I saw a thread on another reflector with someone having an ALC issue hooking up their amp (was neg going) to a positive ALC type radio. Could be, just needed the battery terminals reduced. I HAVE noticed on my 857 that if I apply TOO much negative to the ALC tip, I get odd SWR readings... Both on the internal idiot meter and the external meter. Nothing major, but goes to show the ALC system is probably tied into the SWR as well (which would make sense, high swr shutdown). Anywho, yeah, this circuit will work on pretty much all the radios I've tried it on... Just beware of what YOUR radio wants for ALC voltage... + or - 2 to 4 volts??? --Shane K6VXI Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Jim KF2SY on February 03, 2011, 06:10:21 AM Spent more time on the air last night with my friends 735 and this box. He sounded really good with it. C Clark, I modified my IC 735 for better sounding AM the old fashioned way ( changing coupling & by-pass caps) after a lengthy on-air tutorial by Timtron WA1HLR back around 1992 or '93. There is internal pots for the ALC which can be adjusted to eliminate the backward modulation. Much of these internal circuitry mods can probably be skipped with very good results by feeding the audio directly to the back of the radio via the DIN connectors AFSK audio input pin. This is the way I use it now. I think Joe, N1VIV does this also with his 735. The Icom 735 AM transmit does NOT go thru any SSB filtering. Very good HI-FI results can be had. Jim Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KA2QFX on February 04, 2011, 02:27:49 PM I am intending to write a white paper on ALC, as this is a subject which interests me and I have investigated in some depth over the years on several amateur product lines. My interest stemming mainly from that fact that ALC is often more of a detriment than asset in transmitting a “good” signal. “Good” of course being a very subjective term meaning something quite different to an “AMer” than a “Contester”. However, my outline for the white paper indicated a lengthier document than expected and one which requires a little more bench measurement before I publish.
In lieu of that, here’s a brief explanation of how and why the external bias method works on some later transmitters, and what problems it does and does not solve. The attached diagram (below) describes in simple block form the AM ALC control loop of an ICOM 746. Other late model ICOM's and some Yaesu's follow similar designs. You’ll notice that for AM there are three variables that control the level of RF applied to the final amplifier. 1. The AM carrier level control; this is the amount of unbalance applied to the balanced modulator. This is the primary factor in determining the optimum ratio of audio to carrier in the radio. Too low a setting will produce a DSB signal below baseline as – peaks are increased. Too high a setting and the positive peaks will be clipped early as the modulator runs out of headroom. The optimum setting theoretically is where the RF out, at carrier is ½ of the maximum modulated output. That however, in this design, is subject to the amount of available RF applied to the modulator. Which brings us to 2. The “power”control: The output of the BM is proportional to the product of the RF and audio levels applied to the mixer. However, in practice using IC balanced modulators there are limits to the output available depending on input levels, mixer efficiency and power supply voltage. I would much prefer that power be controlled after the BM to avoid the issue of matching audio, carrier offset and RF in the BM when used for AM. In this case the “Power” applied to the BM is determined by the radio’s CPU and a voltage controlled amplifier (VCA) regulating the 3rd L.O. input to the BM. And finally 3. The following IF amplifier chain which contains another VCA controlled by the ALC control voltage. This control voltage is also developed by several other entities such as reflected power, which I’ve shown. Normally the IF chain following point “A” operates at full gain. Let’s arbitrarily say from “A” to output is 30dB of gain. Let’s also say that the forward power detector develops -10 volts at 100 watts of RF output. So, for 100 watts of output, 2.2 volts of signal is required at “A”, or 22 volts at “B”. Any more than that and the ALC will reduce the gain of the IF amp to maintain 100 watts output. Naturally, for SSB this gain reduction is easily compensated for by adding a little more audio drive. But since this gain reduction also reduces the AM carrier it is undesirable. In addition, on AM, a low pass filter is added to the ALC loop to filter out the modulating peaks normally detected on sideband. Since this filter must have some reasonable response time it is limited in how low a modulating frequency it can filter out. Consequently, signals which have somewhat enhanced low end suffer greatly from premature ALC action. (Yaesu uses this ALC loop actively to stabilize power output making things much worse in this regard.) This control loop is rather critical in that you’ll see that as the gain is reduced to hold the output at 100 watts, the ALC detected voltage will also remain about -10 volts. So the threshold remains apparently fixed while the gain of the IF amp is reduced. It is therefore likely that the position of the potentiometer used to develop the external ALC is likely rather “touchy”? OK, so now you set the External ALC potentiometer to reduce the gain of the IF by 12 dB. To develop the same 100 watts output still requires 22 volts at “B” but “A” has been raised to 8.75 volts. That’s 12dB more signal. In terms of the output from that balanced modulator you now need to raise the carrier level (Power Control) up 12dB to compensate and your audio level also can be raised proportionally. Your normal ALC detection system would now have to see significantly more RF than 100 watts to exceed to the setpoint of the external ALC input. Because of transfer functions of the ALC loop, which I won’t get into, it’s not 12dB more, but it is enough to effectively disable the ALC almost completely; certainly greater power than the final amplifier can deliver. Unfortunately, the same holds true for the SWR protection system. Since the ALC voltages are all summed to provide attenuation by the same mechanism++, the reflected power would also need to be significantly higher to reduce the gain and protect the final amplifier. Hence you have no protection either. I chose 12 dB just as a matter of convenience, but it’s likely not far from reality. To determine just how much attenuation you are inserting do the following. Set your external ALC as you desire for AM operation. Unplug the external ALC. Set the power level as high as possible WITHOUT developing any ALC. Measure the output. Plug the external ALC in and measure again. The difference in dB is easily calculated as 10 *log(low/high). ++ This likely explains why some of you have reported strange indications of SWR metering. A final word on ALC in general. Overall, I find the affect of ALC on signal quality to be undesirable. But to simply defeat it altogether I consider unwise UNLESS some other method of strictly controlling excessive output is employed. For many of us on AM that method is a properly set peak limiter in the audio chain. In my opinion, ALC is a desirable protection method to destructive overdrive, a last resort so to speak. I rely on ALC when tuning my grid driven amplifier. The ALC in this case is derived from the grid current of a pair of 4CX250Bs. Any grid current (>120uA) develops plenty of ALC and pulls the exciter down preventing blown grids. For tuning it’s great. I would never use it to limit my audio peaks actively during transmit. Contesters (and others) who use it as a form of cheap compression should have their mic cords snipped! Some have argued that ALC action itself causes distortion and splatter. I’ve read the article posted recently http://www.sm5bsz.com/dynrange/alc.htm (http://www.sm5bsz.com/dynrange/alc.htm) on the subject and cannot concur with its findings, mainly because I find the test methodology flawed. But that’s another matter. My feeling is that splatter which is coincident with high levels of ALC is more the result of overshoot and flat-topping from ALC delay and distortion in the lower level stages and from simply overdriven mixers and amplifiers. But this is a matter I will address in my paper after much more data collection and number crunching. Comments and experience of others are welcomed. Perhaps the moderators would choose to make this a different thread altogether. Regards, Mark Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W3DBB on February 05, 2011, 09:04:14 AM I've been pissing around with an Icom IC-737 on 40m AM. It sounds like "2 Dixie Cups and a string". In defense of the IC-737, it modulates correctly as it maintains a steady 25W carrier with close to 100W PEP output. This without resorting to the golden screwdriver or an ALC defeating device. I'm pretty sure AM still goes through the IC-737's balanced modulator with its inherent audio bandpass frequency response limitations so the capability of the Heil ICM microphone I'm using is largely unrealized. By comparison the Yaesu FT-920 I've owned since new is awful on AM. The only good one I've heard is NA3CW Chuck's modified FT-920. A Mark V Yaesu recently acquired is much, much better than the unmodified IC-737 and unmodified FT-920 on AM. Plus the Mark V will make a 50W carrier with close to 200W PEP out on AM. Also have another Icom, a barebones IC-707, forerunner of the IC-718. This one is pretty much an unknown at this point when it comes to AM performance but it may be pressed into service before long at the portable/3 location. The moral of the story: solid-state transceivers are are a mixed bag when it comes to their performance on AM.
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KA8WTK on February 05, 2011, 05:47:20 PM Built one of these boxes and put it on my IC-730. Here is what I am seeing.
I adjust my monitor scope for 4 divisions in CW transmit at full power (100 watts). I then use the box to reduce the trace on the scope to 1 division high (25 watts). Switching to AM, modulation will hit 100% (4 divisions) on the scope. Power meter deflects up instead of backwards like "normal". But, I can do the same thing by reducing the RF power control on the front panel to 25 watts out (1 division). So, I don't see an advantage to the box with this particular radio. I wonder if it has had some sort of modification or has had some ALC tweaks made by a previous owner? Or, the ALC setup in the IC-730 is different than the newer Icoms. Or, and this is a BIG possibility, I am doing something wrong. Bill KA8WTK Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KA2QFX on February 05, 2011, 07:55:11 PM Bill,
I can't imagine what you could be doing wrong. So I don't think any operator error is possible. I suspect your ALC has been tweaked as you say. Without the external ALC do you see ALC action on the meter in the radio normally when you hit 100 watts? Or, perhaps a better question, at what power level do you see ALC kicking in, or "backwards" swing start to occur? Not sure on the exact ALC implementation on the 730, but I doubt it's too different. I'll have to review a schematic. Suffice to say that your 730 is similar in that the "power" control and ALC use separate circuitry to control output level; which is why this method works at all. Thanks for your info. Mark Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Opcom on February 05, 2011, 08:30:05 PM Please write the paper!
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: K5WLF on February 06, 2011, 12:56:10 AM I'm in the process of trying to put together a good AM station. I'm currently working with just a Yaesu FT-897D. From all the reading I've done, I have somewhat ambivalent feelings about ALC. I'm definitely looking forward to your paper, which I hope will clear up some of my probably misconceptions.
ldb K5WLF Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KA2QFX on February 06, 2011, 05:17:21 PM For what it's worth my paper will take a while. I need to get several late model radios across the bench and apply a standard set of tests to determine exactly how various ALC circuits respond and affect the output of various radios. Things like attack delay, attack rate, compression level, averaging filter rolloff (AM), etcetera.
Aside from the number crunching I think I pretty much summed up my opinion of ALC above. I can understand the ambivalence toward ALC. I try to avoid it completely, but I'm glad it's there when I goof-up. Mark Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Steve - K4HX on February 06, 2011, 08:18:07 PM Sounds like a peak limiter would be more appropriate.
The problems with single-channel integrating feedback control systems are well known. Most ALC systems are of this type and will have the same problems. This is why broadcasters went to multi-section, multi-band approaches decades ago. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: WD8BIL on February 07, 2011, 09:39:11 AM KA8WTK wrote:
Quote But, I can do the same thing by reducing the RF power control on the front panel to 25 watts out (1 division). So, I don't see an advantage to the box with this particular radio. I wonder if it has had some sort of modification or has had some ALC tweaks made by a previous owner? Or, the ALC setup in the IC-730 is different than the newer Icoms. Hi Bill. If you're gonna see a difference it will be on voice peaks. "P" pops and atomic yeeaallooowwws may drive the normal ALC to cut the carrier. If this isn't happening then there's a good chance someone has tweaked it already. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W2VW on February 07, 2011, 09:49:48 AM I used a 730 back in the late 80s. Ran one of those Radio Shack 5 band equalizers right into the mic input. It didn't seem to have any ALC problems at all with 20 watts carrier.
A much easier radio touse on AM than many later Icomz. Built one of these boxes and put it on my IC-730. Here is what I am seeing. I adjust my monitor scope for 4 divisions in CW transmit at full power (100 watts). I then use the box to reduce the trace on the scope to 1 division high (25 watts). Switching to AM, modulation will hit 100% (4 divisions) on the scope. Power meter deflects up instead of backwards like "normal". But, I can do the same thing by reducing the RF power control on the front panel to 25 watts out (1 division). So, I don't see an advantage to the box with this particular radio. I wonder if it has had some sort of modification or has had some ALC tweaks made by a previous owner? Or, the ALC setup in the IC-730 is different than the newer Icoms. Or, and this is a BIG possibility, I am doing something wrong. Bill KA8WTK Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: WA3VJB on February 07, 2011, 10:00:34 AM Sounds like a peak limiter would be more appropriate. The problems with single-channel integrating feedback control systems are well known. Most ALC systems are of this type and will have the same problems. This is why broadcasters went to multi-section, multi-band approaches decades ago. Yep. The KO6NM approach. (http://qsl.net/wa3vjb/610A-Full.jpg) Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KA2QFX on February 07, 2011, 10:10:50 AM Steve is of course quite correct. While I neglected to include it in the above writing I advocate the use of limiters and compressors as a much more practical way of controlling the output of one's transmitter. In this instance I tried to focus simply on the mechanism of using external ALC to work around the problem in these rice boxes.
Regarding the problems of integrated feedback control systems being "well known" I suppose that's true amongst engineering oriented operators. However, listening to the bands during a typical SSB corn-test it's obviously less well known. :) Hopefully, I'll be able to put some more tangible numbers to the detrimental affects of ALC; not that it's likely to solve any problems, but it can't hurt. One of the hypotheses I hope to prove is that later implementations of ALC in ham gear, which moved ALC from the audio stages to the RF stages, made things much worse. It is likely that the RF designers were seeking to reduce some of the problems inherent with integrating the feedback for audio and applying it so early in the RF chain. By moving it to the later RF stages (post filtering) they may have sped up their integration and reduced some of the delay/overshoot issues but inadvertently made matters worse as far as widened bandwidth. Some of SM5BSZ's later analysis indicates the ALC loop behaves as an under-damped control loop. The compromises available between speed, damping and increased bandwidth are likely all poor. But I'd like to know what compromise the ricebox designers chose just because I'm curious. Granted, integrated DSP and SDRs resolves much of this problem having the ability to "look ahead". But I'm still inclined to satisfy my curiosity. Thank you Steve, you have a gift for being concise. Mark Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Steve - K4HX on February 07, 2011, 10:52:40 AM I generalized more than I was concise. ;D That's why I'm all for getting some measurements on actual radios and doing some circuit analysis (specifics). It should be quite interesting, and as you say, may open some eyes. Go for it!
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: K5UJ on February 07, 2011, 01:30:45 PM I read the SM5BSZ article a few years ago (this was back before I got into AM) and hauled out the service manual and schematics for my FT1000MP Mk V to see how its ALC works. It is the typical PA coupler that sends a control voltage back to a VCA at I think, the 455 KHz IF. I did not and do not know enough to understand all the precise design details but I was able to grasp that the fundamental flaw with ALC for peak power limiting is that once a too-high peak has gotten to the coupler, it is to late to do anything about it. It seemed like the circuit, which seemed to make sense for VSWR protection, was a cheap way of providing some sort of forward peak limiting, but I never heard of such a scheme being employed in any professional gear like broadcast rigs. I figured since broadcasters seem to employ agressive audio peak limiting, I'd go that route and I did, originally for SSB, but I soon realized I could operate AM with it and I did and proceeded to make that my primary voice mode. But before I did that, I would set the peak limit on the audio, to not let the rig go over say, 150 watts, crank the "power" pot on the rig almost all the way up and limit the rig's peak power with no ALC intervention. I never did anything to the rig"s ALC so on AM I can run it as a 20 w. exciter and not see any ALC intervention. I think I see it at around 30 watts and 120 to 130% positive modulation.
Rob Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1FVB on February 22, 2011, 02:29:57 PM I've tried this on my ic-735 and it doesn't make sense at all. If you limit the carrier to about 20 W with external ALC control, it limits the radio's TOTAL output to 20 W. No room for decent modulation what so ever.
Am I missing something here? or is it my 735 Frits Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Steve - K4HX on February 22, 2011, 03:19:47 PM Set the external ALC control so there is NO ALC on modulation peaks when you run 20 watts of carrier.
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1FVB on February 22, 2011, 03:54:15 PM Set the external ALC control so there is NO ALC on modulation peaks when you run 20 watts of carrier. Thanks for clarifying Steve, I thought this topic explained on how to "easily" set the AM carrier level on a old rig like the 735. Another way I've noticed to not have ALC action on modulation peak is to set the internal RF Max output potmeter a little bit higher. Frits Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W2VW on February 23, 2011, 03:36:37 PM Set the external ALC control so there is NO ALC on modulation peaks when you run 20 watts of carrier. Thanks for clarifying Steve, I thought this topic explained on how to "easily" set the AM carrier level on a old rig like the 735. Another way I've noticed to not have ALC action on modulation peak is to set the internal RF Max output potmeter a little bit higher. Frits That does work but now audio compression is really needed on ssb. Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: W1FVB on February 23, 2011, 04:00:04 PM Quote That does work but now audio compression is really needed on ssb. I have not noticed that, but then again I'm barely using it on sideband anyway. Frits Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on February 23, 2011, 05:43:37 PM Be aware that some of the earlier Icoms, the pre-DSP's, handled the internal ALC differently then some of the more recent rigs like the 756 series, 7600, 7700, and 7800. These newer rigs also don't use a balanced modulator. So, depending on the rig, this external voltage tweaking, may or may not result in useful results. Also, if using this voltage tweaking, and the rig is driving a linear amplifier, diligence should be done in monitoring the amplifier output to prevent over-driving the amplifier.
Title: Re: Icoms on AM, external ALC mod Post by: KW4DE on January 30, 2019, 08:06:15 PM Has anyone experimented with the external ALC mod on a 7300 or 7610? Works well on older Icoms. AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
|