The AM Forum

THE AM BULLETIN BOARD => Technical Forum => Topic started by: N8UH on August 16, 2010, 03:29:31 PM



Title: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 16, 2010, 03:29:31 PM
Well, my search for mod iron has come to a end, and I may have ended up with more than I bargained for! ;D

Dahl transformer and reactor from a 5KW rig, 4-1000 modulator deck, Audio amp section, Meters - oh my! The seller is also throwing a 2500V plate transformer from a BC1H (2500V 1.5A). So I'm getting a lot to work with!

Whew.

Obviously, I've come to a bit of a fork in the road. My options are:

1. Move on with the 813sX813s build, and sell off the 4-1000s, sockets, filament transformer, etc. Probably later regretting the decision because the 4-1000s are absolute beauties.

2. Use a single 4-1000 as my PA and find something to modulate it, perhaps a pair of 833s. That way, I could still use the 2 10VCT 10A transformers I have on the way.

3. ??? Something else ???

Option #2 seems feasible. Looking at the 4-1000 data sheet, it appears that one would be fairly happy loafing around at 2500V. Same with the 833s. I think the only difficulty might be the addition of a bias supply for the 833s, since it seems they prefer to have a bit o' bias. Not a really big deal though. This would leave me a spare 4-1000 for replacement down the road.

Now, I've never worked with 4-1000s before, so what do the gurus here think of the possibility?


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 16, 2010, 04:15:44 PM
Yes, the 4X1 option #2 is the way to go. It's just like buying a gun safe... go with something bigger than what you need, cuz you will find a way to fill it up.

There's many plate modulated  813 rigs on the air. There precious few 4-1000A plate modulated rigs. Half the fun of operating is telling your buds about the rig. There is a certain awe when someone tells you they are running a 4X1 plate modulated by 833A's or 4X1's.

It will take about the same efort to do 813's as 4X1's. You have the iron - definately build the big rig. Later, you can always go back and build an 813 rig when you feel green. It will feel like a pushover in comparison... ;D

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 16, 2010, 09:03:03 PM
Why not modulate the 4-1000A with a pair of 813s triode connected? Or 4 push pull parallel.  Build the rig modular style so it can be upgraded when you find bigger parts. A 4-1000a at 2500 volts should be easy to tame. 


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WBear2GCR on August 16, 2010, 09:10:28 PM
 4 x 813 push pull parallel might fly... you have to be careful about the balance between each pair... and you need mod iron with a low enough primary Z, I would think... since the plates will be paralleled...

Otoh a pair of 4-400 or even 4-250 will likely modulate the pants off it...

        :D

                   _-_-bear


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 16, 2010, 09:11:18 PM
Yep, I run my 4X1 modulated by a pair (all tetrode-connected) at 2200 volts most of the time. It will put out plenty of soup. It has a 3KV tap which is more than enuff if you match the tank to the final properly and draw some serious current.  I just love the 4X1 for AM work.

813's in p-p par will work OK fine, but personally, I would stick wid 833A's or a pair of 4X1 as modulators. If you're gonna build a big rig, do it right. It's the difference between riding a real Harley or a  Honda Harley. Both will do the job, but one has more class.. ;D

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 16, 2010, 09:11:55 PM
Bill, KB1DX has/had 4 x 813s as modulators. He sounded great!


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 16, 2010, 09:14:56 PM
Bill, KB1DX has/had 4 x 813s as modulators. He sounded great!

Yep, he sounds excellent. I'm the one who suggested to him to add two more 813's. He also acquired my old Peter Dahl mod iron for that rig years ago. I believe he is running 4-400A's in the final...

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 16, 2010, 11:00:05 PM
I'll have to figure out the ratio on the transformer when I get it all home. The 4-1000s were modulating a 3cx2500a3. Is there a way I can figure out the ratio?

I was thinking of doing 4X813s, but figuring around $50/tube for 813s or $79 (on sale, RF Parts) for 833s, well...

That, and I like the looks of them ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 16, 2010, 11:35:40 PM
Yep. To figure out the modulation transformer ratio, plug the primary into 120VAC and then measure the secondary winding voltage. For example, if you get 120V in and 84 volts out, then this is a ~ 1.4 : 1 turns ratio step down. What really means something for calculating tube matching is the impedance ratio. Just square the turns ratio to get the impedance ratio. 1.4 * 1.4 = 2:1 step down imp ratio.

If you measure 120V in and 120V out, then this is both a 1:1 turns AND impedance ratio.

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K5UJ on August 17, 2010, 07:45:56 AM
If you are planning from scratch I would go with a dual tube modulator rather than 4 x 813 simply because two tubes means less tubes to deal with if there are problems, and less hardware to buy, half the no. holes to punch and so on.

In any event I recommend going for a lot of audio power.   I would take the carrier the rig can run, and figure out the audio needed to asymmetrically modulate it to 150% (around 6 times carrier) and at least shoot for that.  You may not run that much power/audio but you will be able to go to say 100% cleanly with a lot of compression and other processing which you may get into some day so eventually you'll have the reserve built in to handle an outboard broadcast processor if you ever get one.   This will let you get beyond the typical ham and some low powered mil. gear audio limits.  The few hams I work with a healthy amount of audio punch are running rigs with parts pulled from broadcast rigs.

if the iron is from Dennis in AZ I will be interested in finding out the mod. tran. impedance as the reactor that goes with it is 30 H 1.5 A if I am not mistaken and that leads me to believe the Z is relatively low, around 2 or 3 K ohms.

rob


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 17, 2010, 08:07:49 AM
the Iron is the hard part to find, and now you have it!! 4X1s are nice friendly tubes and pretty easy to work with. Also good used pulls are cheap and readily findable.
A single 4X1 mod by a pair of 833s would be the "Holy grail". Or a pair of 4-400 modders wouldnt be bad either. It would also look pretty sexy behind a big peek-a-boo window!!

Steve has a real nice skiz for a push-pull 4-400 AB1 modulator over on the am window website, might be worth your checking out. AB1 4-400s require a lot less audio drive than the 833s!!

Tom Vu is right on the money with ringing out the tranny with 120 to determine its turns ratio. That will also help you determine your choice of mod tubes.

                                                           The Slab Bacon


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: W7TFO on August 17, 2010, 10:34:43 AM
Tis I, indeed responsible. QRO!;)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KE6DF on August 17, 2010, 10:46:42 AM
Why stop with a small tube like a 4-1000?

Why not see if you can find one of these:  :)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 18, 2010, 03:05:21 AM
Thanks guys, great comments. And I agree - Build it once and build it BIG! I really appreciate things that are overbuilt and under-stressed.

Now is where I get to show my relative ignorance in hollow state circuit design  :D

When I get the stuff all home and rest a bit after struggling it out of the truck, I'll test the transformer and figure out the impedance ratio. That's pretty straight forward. Now, after I find that out, what next? How does one choose a pair of modulators based upon this information?

I'm really interested in learning how a transmitter like this is designed. If I can better understand how and why these design decisions are made, I'll take comfort down the road knowing that the decisions made were the right ones. And it makes for good, lively discussion!  ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 18, 2010, 08:23:30 AM
Tim,
       A good "rule of thumb" is to have modder tubes that total up to the same dissapation as the final (or something close to it). Also, you should have as much audio power as you expect to put out in carrier power. The rule of thumb is to have as much audio power as you have DC input to the final. But having more gives a nice headroom cushion so you dont have to push the audio section into distortion.

Example: 2x 833=900w dissapation + 1x 4-1000A = 1000w dissapation = close enough to be love at first sight and live happily ever after.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 18, 2010, 09:58:04 AM
10-4 there Slab Bacon!

Another technique the Tron taught me for matching tubes to the iron....

If you modulate ONE final by a pair of the SAME tube type, (ONE 4X1 modulated by a PAIR) the transfomer impedance ratio required is about 1:1.   If you want to create a 2:1 step down ratio to best match a particular transformer, then use a PAIR modulated by a PAIR of the same type.  (two 4X1's modulated by a pair)

You will need naturally be running each of the two finals at their normal currents, thus generating 1/2 the impedance of just one tube.  (and putting out X2 power) However, I have loaded a pair lightly and even though the ratio may be off, there is still plenty of headroom when using 2X2 combo of the SAME type tubes throughout. It may be overkill  when using 1X2 of the same tube, but what the heck, it's super clean with lots of headroom.

I happen to have a ~1.5:1 RCA BC mod transformer, so used  one 4X1  modulated by a pair. 

The lower ratio will usually give higher audio peaks at the expense of more plate color on the modulators, assuming the tube headroom is available.

The same rule works for 813's, 833A's etc.


Of course you can use different tubes and look up the p-p tube's modulater impedance in the handbook - and calculate the E/I load of the class C final. However, the class C final is not exactly E/I - I'd have to look up the factor - or maybe someone here knows it. (0.70?)

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 18, 2010, 11:00:25 AM
the turns ratio is actually more important than the impedance ratio. The impedance seen by the modder plates is a direct function of the turns ratio and the operating
parameters of the final as the munky swings.

Tom,
      we have always discussed the 1:1, 2:1 thing. 1:1 was always said to be for "1 of something modded by 2 of something similar". 2:1 was for "2 of something being modded by 2 of something similar". Just like you said. 

A little extra leverage gives more munky swing without working things as hard.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 18, 2010, 08:05:10 PM
or when you need to move something heavy.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Opcom on August 18, 2010, 09:51:01 PM
Let's look at pp-par 813's vs pp 833's from the transformer's view.
813's are ICAS, but CCS gives 2250VDC, 10K p-p, Z and 760W
833's at 2500V in the same socket ought to do 1100+ watts

TypeEbIb(max mA)Po(W)Zo(p-p)Drive (W)
813250058098095000
83330007501650950020

If you will only ever run 2500V, 813's ought to do OK. What pleases you for appearance and reliability is what matters.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KM1H on August 19, 2010, 10:23:38 AM
I dont understand why some have to use CB sounding language....it sounds retarded, not cute, as many have commented on other forums while Googling for AM info.

Carl


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 19, 2010, 10:38:41 AM
I dont understand why some have to use CB sounding language....it sounds retarded, not cute, as many have commented on other forums while Googling for AM info.

Carl

Because we can  ;D  ;D

Why do we use ham jargan instead of talking like we do in non-ham circles??

Because we can!  ;D  ;D

Life is by far too short to waste precious time worrying about stuff like that.
Life will also deal you lots of occasions to get you really pissed off, so why waste them
worrying about little stuff!


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KC4VWU on August 19, 2010, 12:50:26 PM
Yeah, Frank's in good spirits; his bud is getting in good shape and he's happy, just having a little fun. Cut him a little slack.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 19, 2010, 01:40:21 PM
Yup, no harm in a little silly-talk. Keeps things from getting too dry :D

The examples and explanations above have really helped me get my head around this. I guess where I have flexibility is the fact that I'm getting 2 4X1s, so depending on mod ratio, I can use 1 or 2 in the PA to make it work. To get things exact, it's down to selection of modulation tubes for dissipation and P-P impedance. *crosses fingers hoping that 833s will work*

Since the original TX was using 2-4X1s modulating a single 3cx2500, could one assume that the ratio would be closer to 1:1?

Slab, I see what you mean by having enough audio - matching modulator dissipation to PA dissipation seems like a good rule-of-thumb to give you more than enough audio.

As I mentioned before, I'm getting the original audio amp section from the TX - 12BY7s driving EL34s that were slapping the 4X1s around cathode-follower style. I'm thinking that with a bit of work it should work fine as an audio driver for what ever I have in the modulator section. But I'm going to have to change out the EL34s to something the AudioPhools haven't driven the price up on. So I'm probably covered for audio drive. I'm not sure if I'll need to switch over to transformer coupling though.

Now, considering the use of a 4X1 in the PA, how does one figure out what will I need for exciter power?


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 19, 2010, 02:01:05 PM
"Now, considering the use of a 4X1 in the PA, how does one figure out what will I need for exciter power?"


The rear appendix in an early ARRL handbook is a good place to look for operating parameters of older transmitting tubes. I keep a 1963 handbook on the workbench just for reference. IIRC a single 4X1 needs 25-30w RF input to the grid to get happy.
A little extra grid drive will also never hurt when trying to make the high audio peaks.
I drive mine with a single 6146 with somewhere around 450-500v on the 6146 plate.
(around 45-50w DC input) or somewhere around 23-30w of drive.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 19, 2010, 02:20:22 PM
Tim,

Slab is right on with the drive requirements in class C.  Depending on whether you neutralize the final or swamp the grid with a non-inductive resistor (like 2K-5K) will dictate the actual RF drive needed. The bottom line is getting the 40 ma grid and 140 ma screen current under full operating plate load. I drive mine with maybe 15-20w of dead carrier from the ricebox.  Mine is neutraized and has about 8K of swamping, so easy to drive.

For an audio driver, consider the all-new WA1GFZ MOSFET driver. I use one to drive the p-p 4X1 modulators in tetrode connected class AB1.  It's as clean a driver as you will ever get with response so low that you can just about run shark fin audio polarity. The only limitation is the mod iron.  A direct coupled tube driver (I think what you were discussing) will be FB too, of course.

Info and pictures of the GFZ MOSFET audio driver prototype for most any modulators, including 811A, 813's, 833A's 4-1000A's, etc are below.

http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=23632.0

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 19, 2010, 03:08:17 PM
833s would need a few resistor value changes to get more output voltage swing at required bias voltage. The 833 needs a lot more negative bias than a 4-1000A and more peak to peak drive. This makes the resistor values a bit more critical to bias each stage at the right spot. This wasn't an issue for Tom so there was no point in changing the configuration he has. I simulated the 833 after we completed Tom's rig but the good news is the simulation matched the test results.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 19, 2010, 03:28:46 PM
833s would need a few resistor value changes to get more output voltage swing at required bias voltage. The 833 needs a lot more negative bias than a 4-1000A and more peak to peak drive. This makes the resistor values a bit more critical to bias each stage at the right spot. This wasn't an issue for Tom so there was no point in changing the configuration he has. I simulated the 833 after we completed Tom's rig but the good news is the simulation matched the test results.

Good to know. I see what you are saying after looking at the data sheets. It looks like a pair of 833s or 4-100s need 3X-4X times the audio drive of 4X1s, if I'm interpreting things correctly.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 19, 2010, 03:55:10 PM
Yes, with about 90 volts of negative bias.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K5UJ on August 19, 2010, 04:37:50 PM
Hi,

I'm afraid I have to agree with Carl. I do not want to distract from the topic so I have blown this off in the past but I merely wish to interject a practical concern.  I played around with CB stuff for about a year in 1970 before I got my first ham ticket.  I know nothing of the current CB culture so the CB venacular is nonsense to me.   That would not matter except as a noob in AM I am trying to learn.  So while it may be fun and I'll be the first to say it is all about having fun, when used, it obfuscates and makes some points utterly meaningless to new people like me.   It's hard enough to figure this stuff out anyway but when I see the CB lingo I immediately tune out and move on.

Rob


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 19, 2010, 05:49:34 PM
I too am a newbie to AM, and at first the vernacular threw me a bit. But this helped me out:

http://www.w1ujr.net/glossary.htm

I got used to it. Now it's fun. ;)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K5UJ on August 19, 2010, 06:22:08 PM
okay Tim thanks; I knew most of the words on that list but for some reason I thought the monkey thing was CB lingo and it was one I did not get.   Sorry about that.  Carry on....

Rob 


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Opcom on August 19, 2010, 07:50:07 PM
EL34's were cheap like $13 a few years ago at Penta Labs if you buy a case of 20. I did that because of a Bogen MO-200 that used eight 8417's, which are even more expensive. I converted it to 6550's but am going to EL34's next time I see the amp. I already have it set up for stereo, individual bias, and cathode curent monitoring so it is very easy to balance up. You might not need so many tubes, but why risk running out? The EL34 is my new "high voltage 6L6" and "low current 6550".



Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KM1H on August 19, 2010, 09:30:21 PM
I too am a newbie to AM, and at first the vernacular threw me a bit. But this helped me out:

http://www.w1ujr.net/glossary.htm

I got used to it. Now it's fun. ;)


Quote
TimTron Tim WA1HLR, very well know Maine AMer. Originator of many of the fine phrases on this page.


That confirms my retarded remark ;D

Carl


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 19, 2010, 09:40:35 PM
Retards are people too.   :P


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 19, 2010, 10:32:02 PM
Whackers and good buddies are people too...  :-*    Caw Mawn.

T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KB2WIG on August 19, 2010, 11:18:32 PM
'" It's people. Soylent Green is made out of people. "


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KC4VWU on August 20, 2010, 01:33:26 AM
Dude! Soylent Green! That movie is way cool and totally a classic. The ending is sooo gnarley!

That was surfer slang a-la Jeff Spicoli. Can also be used to comment on or describe boatanchor gear and amateur radio practices.

73, Phil


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 08:12:40 AM
okay Tim thanks; I knew most of the words on that list but for some reason I thought the monkey thing was CB lingo and it was one I did not get.   Sorry about that.  Carry on....

Rob 

Rob,
      "Munky swing" (note spelling) is refering to your plate current or outpoot wattmeter needle wiggling with your modulation. Yes, it is CB jargan, but it's fun. When you be "swingin the munky", you are getting good mod peaks.

Lets face it AMers have their own jargan and slang as well. So do the inbred SSB operators.
It's just fun. Where do you think my "Slab Bacon" monicre came from?? One of the things that the SSB operators resent about us is that we have fun on the air!!

Carl,
       you gotta learn to stop being a "stick in the mud" and loosen up, lighten up and have some fun!! Life is just too short. Have fun while your here, cause you cant after they plant you. Like the old song goes "In heaven there is no beer, that's why we drink it here!"
Have some fun and loosen up a bit.

Put yourself in my shoes!! I have been told that my end is coming a lot sooner than I had planned. (How would you like to live with that sword hanging over your head??) Am I grumpy, NO! I'm gonna be happy and enjoy things to the fullest while I still can!
Dont waste the effort worrying (or pissing and moaning) about things that really dont matter!

                                                           The Slab Bacon
                                                       (wit da fat meat shakin)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 20, 2010, 10:19:11 AM
better to burn out than fade away
As I told a girl I know from High School last week who is married to another school mate.
Better to be shot down in flames then never fly


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 20, 2010, 11:01:06 AM
better to burn out than fade away
As I told a girl I know from High School last week who is married to another school mate.
Better to be shot down in flames then never fly


Reminds me of a couple of sayings:

"I'd rather live a day as a lion than a lifetime as a sheep."



And, JJ paraphrased:

"When I die, I want life to have been going through the gears burning rubber, accelerating to 140+, passing cars, swerving and carrying on - until I slide in sideways, spitting rocks and smoke, my body all used up, totally spent."    ;D

 


T


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 20, 2010, 11:50:40 AM
Yep, sell your house, quit your job and head to New Zealand to do some base jumping. After all......


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 11:57:41 AM
better to burn out than fade away
As I told a girl I know from High School last week who is married to another school mate.
Better to be shot down in flames then never fly
Reminds me of a couple of sayings:
"I'd rather live a day as a lion than a lifetime as a sheep."
And, JJ paraphrased:

"When I die, I want life to have been going through the gears burning rubber, accelerating to 140+, passing cars, swerving and carrying on - until I slide in sideways, spitting rocks and smoke, my body all used up, totally spent."    ;D
T

those 2 quotes kinda say it all!!

Been there, done that!!

I'm signed up to be an organ donor when I die, but I'll bet they'll have trouble finding
anything left in me worth transplanting into anyone else.

Enjoy what you can today, cause tomorrow might not get here!! (As I had a rude awakening to on Dec 18!!)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 12:00:03 PM
Boy............. Did this thread go off-topic or what!!  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: KM1H on August 20, 2010, 12:28:07 PM
A fade out isnt even in my vocabularly. As anyone who really knows me I can be pretty wild when I want to but I dont go for the dumbing down that has taken over the country.  The so called AM glossary is simply another form of eubonics and I better not get into that on here :o :-X other than to say both are degrading.

"When I die, I want life to have been going through the gears burning rubber, accelerating to 140+, passing cars, swerving and carrying on - until I slide in sideways, spitting rocks and smoke, my body all used up, totally spent."   
T

That will probably very close to the truth considering some of the toys I still drive ;D Back some years ago I lost a 66 Corvette roadster on an exit ramp somewhere around 120...it wasnt pretty.

Nuff said.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 20, 2010, 12:49:54 PM
Many consider Internet forums dumbing-down and degrading.

One thing is for sure, ain't none of us living on the edge or really pushing very many limits.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 20, 2010, 12:55:45 PM
Yea HUZ but the older we get the better we were.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 01:02:55 PM
One thing is for sure, ain't none of us living on the edge or really pushing very many limits.

'cause we're all getting older and (somewhat) wiser. Unfortunately as we get older the brain swells and the ba's shrink :o   ;D

but what some of us did in the past sure comes back to haunt us  ;D  :o

How many old bikers have you ever seen that dont walk with a limp ;D

What I used to do all night now takes me all night to do ;D  ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 20, 2010, 01:04:52 PM
This thread was about building a Maul without making it sing for it's supper. We were talking about how to make the Monkey swing using toobs that have enough scrot to drive a strapping 4X1 without sounding Yellowee or using Loop or shock modulation. We were also talking about JSing a scrotful non-Crapstal (who wants to rubberize a crapstal anyway?) exciter to this thing. There were definitely some Old-Buzzard transmissions, but not too much Pissing and Moaning.

Now, I'm not a JN. I'm comfortable with Drilling and Blasting. I've built all kinds of Piss Weak gear. I just think building a Strapping Maul is far more Intrascent then Pissing and Moaning on Slop Bucket.

But, we are all AMers (or budding AMers). No need to get Yellowified.

 ;D ;D ;D Am I doing it right? ;D ;D ;D

Seriously guys -  This forum is unique in the fact that there is so much combined wisdom and knowledge. Most folks here are extremely knowledgeable and experienced - and are willing to share that knowledge and experience with the rest of us. If folks want to use a bit of slang here and there to keep things fun, so be it. I'm having fun, and learning a ton too. :)

If you really want to see dumbing-down, look on Facebook, or Myspace, or Twitter, or try reading an email or post from someone who insists on using text-speak, or...

By comparison, we're doing pretty good here! ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 20, 2010, 01:08:35 PM
Yep, legends in our own minds.

Memories, light corners of my mind.......   :'(

<Cough>
<gag>   :P

Yea HUZ but the older we get the better we were.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 01:09:07 PM
This thread was about building a Maul without making it sing for it's supper. We were talking about how to make the Monkey swing using toobs that have enough scrot to drive a strapping 4X1 without sounding Yellowee or using Loop or shock modulation. We were also talking about JSing a scrotful non-Crapstal (who wants to rubberize a crapstal anyway?) exciter to this thing. There were definitely some Old-Buzzard transmissions, but not too much Pissing and Moaning.

Now, I'm not a JN. I'm comfortable with Drilling and Blasting. I've built all kinds of Piss Weak gear. I just think building a Strapping Maul is far more Intrascent then Pissing and Moaning on Slop Bucket.

But, we are all AMers (or budding AMers). No need to get Yellowified.

 ;D ;D ;D Am I doing it right? ;D ;D ;D


I LOVE IT ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !  ;D  ;D  ;D

This guy learns fast!!     May your maul strap and never sound hyellowie!!  ;)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on August 20, 2010, 01:09:59 PM
Excellent. Hiram would be proud.

This thread was about building a Maul without making it sing for it's supper. We were talking about how to make the Monkey swing using toobs that have enough scrot to drive a strapping 4X1 without sounding Yellowee or using Loop or shock modulation. We were also talking about JSing a scrotful non-Crapstal (who wants to rubberize a crapstal anyway?) exciter to this thing. There were definitely some Old-Buzzard transmissions, but not too much Pissing and Moaning.

Now, I'm not a JN. I'm comfortable with Drilling and Blasting. I've built all kinds of Piss Weak gear. I just think building a Strapping Maul is far more Intrascent then Pissing and Moaning on Slop Bucket.

But, we are all AMers (or budding AMers). No need to get Yellowified.

 ;D ;D ;D Am I doing it right? ;D ;D ;D

Seriously guys -  This forum is unique in the fact that there is so much combined wisdom and knowledge. Most folks here are extremely knowledgeable and experienced - and are willing to share that knowledge and experience with the rest of us. If folks want to use a bit of slang here and there to keep things fun, so be it. I'm having fun, and learning a ton too. :)

If you really want to see dumbing-down, look on Facebook, or Myspace, or Twitter, or try reading an email or post from someone who insists on using text-speak, or...

By comparison, we're doing pretty good here! ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K1JJ on August 20, 2010, 01:26:54 PM
One thing is for sure, ain't none of us living on the edge or really pushing very many limits.


Hey, one time I returned a video tape and didn't even rewind it!


And you know those bits of toothpaste that fall out of your mouth when brushing?  I dry 'em out and leave 'em around the house as after-dinner-mints for my guests.

Don't tell me I don't live on the edge.

T


BTW, excellent Tron-eeze text Tim... ;D)


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: The Slab Bacon on August 20, 2010, 01:35:05 PM
BTW, excellent Tron-eeze text Tim... ;D)


Yes, he will have to endure one more right of passage:

Getting on AM and hearing Timmy (the Tron) say:
             
                    "Err, I can hear ya up here, but yer kinda piss weak"

 ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: N8UH on August 20, 2010, 02:33:18 PM
BTW, excellent Tron-eeze text Tim... ;D)


Yes, he will have to endure one more right of passage:

Getting on AM and hearing Timmy (the Tron) say:
             
                    "Err, I can hear ya up here, but yer kinda piss weak"

 ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

I can't wait! ;D


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: k4kyv on August 20, 2010, 02:33:49 PM
The CB-esque lingo I hear from the AM crowd doesn't bother me because I can tell it's tongue-in-cheek.  It's different when someone tells me what his "personal" is or signs out with "threes" or "seventy-thirds", or tells me I am wall-to-wall treetop tall. But even so, it still doesn't make me walk round with a turd in my pocket.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: WA1GFZ on August 20, 2010, 04:03:22 PM
I still drink from containers in the fridge....when nobody is looking


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: Ralph W3GL on August 20, 2010, 06:19:53 PM



   Yeah, so do I but then, I live alone...

   Timtronese is another form of "Pidgin" speak, like Ebonics...

   A little bit goes a long way for me...



   



Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: K5UJ on August 20, 2010, 06:36:42 PM
A few terms that have crept into the hobby that mildly annoy me are calling a jack on a rig a "port" as in "antenna port."  That one I think has come in from the computer crowd.  A few others I'm getting used to:  "Key up" and calling any transmitter, receiver or transceiver a radio.  I have (sadly) found myself doing that also.  It was something I noticed immediately when I got back active again 10 years ago after being QRT for 18 years.   In my salad days a "radio" was the broadcast rx in the bathroom or car.  Hams had receivers, transceivers, rigs, and transmitters but no ham in a QSO ever said "what kind of radio do you have?"  Huh?   "A Zenith AM-FM upstairs in the kitchen."   It still grates on me for some reason.  Somehow in the 80s or 90s all our gear became radios.


Title: Re: 813 Rig - Slight change of plans...
Post by: w5omr on August 21, 2010, 08:15:06 AM
2. Use a single 4-1000 as my PA and find something to modulate it, perhaps a pair of 833s. That way, I could still use the 2 10VCT 10A transformers I have on the way.

3. ??? Something else ???

2 10am fil xfmrs?  (4) 813's, push-pull parallel, modulating the 4-1000.

Variac the B+ supply for the final and screen voltage, run about 2400v on the 813's, and bias 'em off... 
thing of beauty.

john/WA5BXO has quad 813's modulating a pair of 250TH's.
AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands