The AM Forum

THE AM BULLETIN BOARD => QSO => Topic started by: wb1aij on June 08, 2009, 12:29:51 PM



Title: Digital TV
Post by: wb1aij on June 08, 2009, 12:29:51 PM
Just connected my mother-in-laws TV up to an A/D converter so she could get the local channels ( her satellite TV does not offer local channels)& got a nice surprise. She used to only get a few channels from Hartford,Ct. & one from New Haven because she is using a rabbit ears antenna.. Now she gets ch 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 24-1, 24-2, 24-3, 30-1, 30-2, 30-3 & they come in much clearer than when she was receiving analog. Seems each transmitter has a few digital channels in the same bandwidth as their old analog bandwidth.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: K9ACT on June 08, 2009, 12:51:10 PM
After using ours for a few months, I have one remaining complaint and it seems to belie one of the basic claims for DTV.

That claim being that much less power is required at the transmitter.  If this is true, it seems to just be a red hearing because they are not getting as much signal into my receiver as the analog stations do/did.

Many of the channels I could get on analog have no signal at all and the ones I do get require very careful pointing of the antenna.  No one direction fits all with digital.

So, it might require less power to get the same signal to my antenna but they are not using the equivalent power level to maintain the same signal strength.  They are just using less power and we have to take what we get.

Having said all that, being 50 miles or so from any stations and no access to cable, it is nice to be able to see clear pictures for a change.  The ones that come in are incredibly clear.

It is obviously a good idea but with many issues we could argue all day about like, why do taxpayers have to get involved in making sure everyone has one and wouldn't you like to have access to the lobbying group that got that contract for whoever is making the converters?

js


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 08, 2009, 01:41:08 PM
After using ours for a few months, I have one remaining complaint and it seems to belie one of the basic claims for DTV.

That claim being that much less power is required at the transmitter.  If this is true, it seems to just be a red hearing because they are not getting as much signal into my receiver as the analog stations do/did.

Not all of them are running their digital transmitters at full licensed power. You won't really know for another four days. It will then change again with allocation and equipment changes over the next year or so.

We're still not even to the halfway point of the transition. Once the NTSC transmitters go dark, then the ATSC transmitters can be put to full power. It costs too much money to run both at full strap at all times (with not one penny reimbursed).

We won't know how the transition went until it's actually happened. This long, agonizing limbo we've been stuck in is about to end. Good riddance, too.

At this point in the game, it's still too early to draw conclusions.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 08, 2009, 01:43:15 PM
Just connected my mother-in-laws TV up to an A/D converter so she could get the local channels ( her satellite TV does not offer local channels)

They're required to by law. Someone should follow up on that.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Tom WA3KLR on June 08, 2009, 02:06:08 PM
Does anyone know the actual law on the switchover time? 

I hear "on the 12th", "by the 12th", "after the 12th...no more analog".  Is anytime during the 12th o.k.?  Or is it supposed to be 12:00:01 a.m. or 12:59:59 p.m. of the 12th?


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 08, 2009, 02:52:03 PM
I'll bet anyone still paying the electric bill on an analog transmitter currently has their finger poised over the "PLATE OFF" button. The only ones still broadcasting analog are doing it so they can honestly say they kept the analog going right up to the very end.

If the time is specified somewhere, they'll all drop off the face of the dial at once. If not, they'll all drop in groups over the course of the day on June 12th and the FCC probably won't care as long as they're all off on June 13th.

You'll notice I didn't care enough to research that very far, either.  ;)


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W1RKW on June 08, 2009, 03:49:09 PM
Bob,
Does your MIL live in CT?  If so, Dish Network and Direct TV offer the local channels on their sats.  Unfortunately, one has to subscribe to receive them.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on June 08, 2009, 05:25:15 PM
From the DTV web site:
The digital transition is underway. Prepare now! On Feb. 17, some full-power broadcast television stations in the United States may stop broadcasting on analog airwaves and begin broadcasting only in digital. The remaining stations may stop broadcasting analog sometime between April 16 and June 12. June 12 is the final deadline for terminating analog broadcasts under legislation passed by Congress.

Want to learn more, then go here:
http://www.dtv.gov/whatisdtv.html


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: kb3ouk on June 08, 2009, 05:48:07 PM
I guess that since the deadline is the 12th you can assume that all stations have to be off by midnight june 12th. the number of subchannels varies some have one channel while there a a few stations(out in LA) that have 8.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KB2WIG on June 08, 2009, 06:15:56 PM
 " I guess that since the deadline is the 12th you can assume that all stations have to be off by midnight june 12th. "

  or be cited for treason
.. ._. _...

klc


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 08, 2009, 07:46:57 PM
Bob,
Does your MIL live in CT?  If so, Dish Network and Direct TV offer the local channels on their sats.  Unfortunately, one has to subscribe to receive them.

It doesn't matter where she lives. Like I said before, all cable and sattelite TV service providers are required by law to provide their subscribers with the local stations serving the Designated Market Area in which they live.

The only waivers to that requirement are those few remaining instances where no uplink yet exists for a given station. Those waivers are not permanent.

If her sattelite carrier doesn't offer the channels serving the DMA she's in, they're either operating under waiver or violating the regs. Failing to offer local channels is not an option for sattelite or cable providers.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Tom WA3KLR on June 08, 2009, 08:04:10 PM
The DTV transmissions from what I've seen on the FCC page below, the coverage is the same or a little better than the NTSC was.  ERPs vary but are generally about 1/10th of what the NTSC transmitter was.  This is not short-changing us as far as signals, its just that the digital modulation with the sound included is more efficient than NTSC; greener broadcasting. 

The DTV signal is essentially vestigial digital AM and like the old NTSC cut the bandwidth in half, but there is only one carrier now and it is much reduced in amplitude, close in level to the digital modulation.

On the FCC page below, plug in your address and you will get the list of stations you should receive.  Click on a station call letters, then click on the Gain/Loss Map link and you will get a map of coverage that compares the old NTSC signal versus the new DTV signal; ERPs are stated for the two systems.

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Tom WA3KLR on June 08, 2009, 08:15:28 PM
There are frequency changes and final power levels to come yet.  Statistically about 1/3 of the DTV stations in your area will change frequency.

Channel 12 here in Philadelphia, one of the main stations has a terrible signal on 12-1 DTV on UHF.  After the switchover they will be back onto Channel 12 with the good old antenna and probably more power to boot. 

You have to wait until after the 12th to see what the final reception levels are. 


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W2VW on June 08, 2009, 11:00:44 PM
The operative word is rescan.

Certain analog transmitters will remain lit after June 12. They will carry an informative, brilliantly produced information loop. Several #1 DMA analogs will be on for two weeks or one month after the 12th.

One large #2 DMA broadcaster will be going dark at 11:30 PM Friday.

Rescan Friday evening.

Certain broadcasters will be making changes for the next few weeks.

Rescan at least once weekly to take advantage of those changes.

Blurb comparing new stuff to old standard from 1952
http://dtvrules.com/DTV_vs.html


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: AJ1G on June 09, 2009, 01:17:42 AM
Don't know what algorithm antennaweb.org uses for DTV service prediction, but it's pretty poor.  Says my QTH should not get any DTV service, yet Channel 69 about 10 miles away in Hopkinton RI pegs the "S meter" on DTV receivers with only a short piece of wire on the antenna input!

For our Charlestown RI cottage, I am going to put in a new UHF antenna along with new high quality twin lead feed and hope for the best. 

On Dish Network here at home.  Only gripe is that we can get only local CT stations on dish, even though we are closer, and more in the market of the RI stations.  Across the river in Westerly, RI, the opposite is true.  Cox Cable, AFAIK, only carries RI stations and no CT stations.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 09, 2009, 01:36:08 AM
On Dish Network here at home.  Only gripe is that we can get only local CT stations on dish, even though we are closer, and more in the market of the RI stations.  Across the river in Westerly, RI, the opposite is true.  Cox Cable, AFAIK, only carries RI stations and no CT stations.

The requirement is to feed stations that have a legal claim to your designated market area. Since cable and sattelite carriers are competing with those same broadcasters for advertising dollars in those DMAs, you can guarantee they won't go one step beyond that requirement.

Who decides what DMA your town is in? A monkey on crack, for all I know.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Tom WA3KLR on June 09, 2009, 09:08:31 AM
Dave, thanks for the technical paper reference. 

DTV signal - you got it or you don't. 

NTSC - analog signal - it's still there and locked - how much snow can you stand?

Chris,

It seems to me that there was an adverse change in the antennaweb.org site.  A few months ago the calculated reception results became much less reasonable than it had been.  As you say a local strong signal for you is missing from the report.  The new FCC page I referenced above is much more realistic.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W2VW on June 09, 2009, 09:14:39 AM
Dave, thanks for the technical paper reference. 



One of the interesting points is the method of power measurement of DTV verses NTSC. DTV isn't as PW as it seems.



Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 09, 2009, 10:00:46 AM
That's quite the writeup. It's also the first one I've seen that tries to explain that ATSC transmit contours must satisfy a 90:50 threshold vs. 50:50 for NTSC and FM broadcast we're accustomed to.

Anyone who just read that paragraph who is asking themselves "what the hell is that supposed to mean?" should follow the link Dave posted.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W3RSW on June 09, 2009, 10:09:08 AM
So far only four DTV stations received here in the middle of the outer Hebrides, three networks and PBS, but I must say, all four are perfect whereas the analog suffered from ghosts, excessive snow and horizontal skewing,  ;D

(...well, would you believe on an old tube archival set?  Makes you wonder what some of the modern analog tuners, synchro horiz. lock/ phase lock loop circuits, etc. would have done with 1950 signals received by local cables or aficionados from the hilltops. Remember those mile long ladder line runs, boosters at the tower, ice, deer, vandelism, and power outages, etc.? )  

Seriously, the DTV from the nearsest local station is perfect in that the old analog station/signal was so close, hills so numerous, etc. that any dipole or 'unipole' had to be aligned by magic to eliminate horrendous ghosting. Most of the time, I just gave up and hoped the ghosts didn't obliterate too much of the 'smaller print.'

The DTV signal from the farthest local (25 miles or so) is still 'perfect'  on a folded diplole taped to the window. Amazing.  Almost makes one want to put up an array on the hill behind the house to get all the Pittsburgh stations, 90 to 100 miles away, just like in the old days.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W1GFH on June 09, 2009, 10:26:38 AM
Set up a DTV box with rabbit ears on the TV in the spare bedroom of a friend's mothers apt. on Central Park West in Manhattan. Got all the local channels -- except WNBC (local analog 4, digital 28 I think) was "no signal". Odd because the xmtr ant. is on the Empire State Bldg with the others, so it should come roaring in. I switched back to analog and it was there, piss weak. But no digital sig. Must be some weird "shearing" of the sigs among the buildings.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 09, 2009, 10:38:35 AM
My money's on multipath cancellation.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W4EWH on June 09, 2009, 10:46:12 AM
Does anyone know the actual law on the switchover time? 

I hope they take cameras to the transmitter sites and show the event. Very few viewers have seen an actual tv transmitter, so it's certainly a newsworthy story. I wouldn't be surprised to see a few old techs get teary-eyed.

73,

Bill W1AC


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 09, 2009, 11:12:12 AM
There's nothing to see. The average TV transmitter looks like any other cabinet with a couple of buttons and some meters. There's no "ooh" nor "aah" factor to them these days. They look about as exciting as the side of a cereal box.

In this day and age, most people just aren't impressed by that sort of thing anymore.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W2VW on June 09, 2009, 11:19:56 AM
should come roaring in. I switched back to analog and it was there, piss weak. But no digital sig. Must be some weird "shearing" of the sigs among the buildings.

If it isn't raining try checking again between 1AM and 4:30 AM. Empire is doing building work and many signals will switch to backup sticks. That will change your multipath situation. This work will last for at least the next month. Don't try it this Friday or Saturday as they might cancel work due to the switchover.

Changing polarity on the receive antenna is one tool to try in that area of the city.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W4EWH on June 09, 2009, 11:23:23 AM
There's nothing to see. The average TV transmitter looks like any other cabinet with a couple of buttons and some meters. There's no "ooh" nor "aah" factor to them these days. They look about as exciting as the side of a cereal box.

In this day and age, most people just aren't impressed by that sort of thing anymore.

I'd bet they'll be interested when they see the tech's faces: the box may look bland, but the people won't.

I was at the New England Telephone office in Back Bay the night we cut the old Panel (electromechanical) office over to a #1 ESS (Electronic Switching System). I say more than one old panel tech wiping tears from their eyes.

YMMV.

Bill W1AC


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 09, 2009, 11:48:25 AM
Most of the engineers who put their blood, sweat, and tears into those transmitters are long gone. Many were laid off and replaced by glorified IT weenies because most owners don't know the difference (they think an MCSE actually has value); many simply left because the work is grueling, the job is thankless, and the pay is pathetic.

There are a few real engineers still around, mostly in the top 20 markets, otherwise the whole industry has been downsized almost below viability.

Don't take my word for it, read the trade rags and forums. The overwhelming consensus is that broadcasting in general (and broadcast engineering in particular) is a dead-end road.

The comparison to NET&T is comparing apples to meteors. That was a very different age, and you were surrounded by people who actually gave a crap. Very few of those people left in any broadcast facilities.

Most of the people who would shed a tear likely won't be there to do it.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: WB2YGF on June 09, 2009, 01:43:38 PM
Set up a DTV box with rabbit ears on the TV in the spare bedroom of a friend's mothers apt. on Central Park West in Manhattan. Got all the local channels -- except WNBC (local analog 4, digital 28 I think) was "no signal". Odd because the xmtr ant. is on the Empire State Bldg with the others, so it should come roaring in. I switched back to analog and it was there, piss weak. But no digital sig. Must be some weird "shearing" of the sigs among the buildings.
WNBC-DT is conspicuous by it's absence here too.  The analog is fine. (central NJ).


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Ralph W3GL on June 09, 2009, 02:58:53 PM
Re: WNBC-DT, 

Check with Dave, W2VW...    He might have an answer to your problem!


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on June 09, 2009, 04:54:36 PM
Set up a DTV box with rabbit ears on the TV in the spare bedroom of a friend's mothers apt. on Central Park West in Manhattan. Got all the local channels -- except WNBC (local analog 4, digital 28 I think) was "no signal". Odd because the xmtr ant. is on the Empire State Bldg with the others, so it should come roaring in. I switched back to analog and it was there, piss weak. But no digital sig. Must be some weird "shearing" of the sigs among the buildings.
WNBC-DT is conspicuous by it's absence here too.  The analog is fine. (central NJ).

Down here in Sayreville, I get 4.1, 4.2 and, I think 4.4 using a 30 year old antenna, with at least 20 year old RG-59 cable. All channels come in great. The last time I did a channel scan, I think the box found 30 to 40 channels. Antenna is facing Northeast.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: flintstone mop on June 09, 2009, 04:56:32 PM
Jack and others srtuggling with signal levels on digital.
There are several UHF antenna manufacturers that offer panel type antennas with about 10dB gain. Not too expensive!
A rotor could also help to pinpoint sigs and a little elevation. We should know the routine.
Preamps are'nt my thing.

Fred


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Tom WA3KLR on June 09, 2009, 07:50:22 PM
AP article just issued on the switchover mentions that the FCC has given the stations freedom to decide what time of the day to switch and that antennas may be swapped out over the next 3 weeks:

http://www.bnd.com/business/story/801494.html


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W2VW on June 09, 2009, 07:59:02 PM
AP article just issued on the switchover mentions that the FCC has given the stations freedom to decide what time of the day to switch and that antennas may be swapped out over the next 3 weeks:

http://www.bnd.com/business/story/801494.html

It is rumored certain broadcasters will celebrate by launching surplus ball bearings with a slingshot toward the R.F. OFF pushbutton from a distance. 


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Ed/KB1HYS on June 09, 2009, 08:28:22 PM
Hmmm,  Ya think that some of those analog transmitters will be coming available soon for low/no cost?
 ;)



Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W2VW on June 10, 2009, 10:16:46 AM
Hmmm,  Ya think that some of those analog transmitters will be coming available soon for low/no cost?
 ;)



Lots. Ya got 480 3 phase there?


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: WA1GFZ on June 10, 2009, 08:28:05 PM
looks like no more TV at the beach till I put up an antenna. Might try a sloper from the window facing W.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: W1ATR on June 11, 2009, 02:32:56 AM
Ok, so does all this mean the sweet little old lady across the street, a.k.a., the daughter of Satan, who has wabbit ears on her TV will stop calling me EVERY SINGLE TIME I key up my superbowl leenyar? 


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: K3ZS on June 11, 2009, 10:07:13 AM
Alas, tomorrow is the end of TVI as we now know it.
We can ditch those lossy low pass filters.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: KA1ZGC on June 11, 2009, 01:37:00 PM
Just heard that the Portland and Bangor NBC affiliates' analog signals will be going dark at 0900 Eastern Friday.

The Bangor affiliate, WLBZ, will be moving back to channel 2 some time after that. I know they have the new channel 2 transmitter on site already, not sure when they'll make that cutover.

It's also worth mentioning that only the fully-licensed NTSC signals will be going dark. Translators and LPTV stations that are currently broadcasting NTSC will continue to do so.

For example, one of WLBZ's translators is on HLR mountain. It's been receiving ATSC and transmitting NTSC since it was first put on the air three-ish years ago, and will continue.

If you live in an area served by a translator or LPTV station, you will continue to receive analog television from them.

It will likely be some number of years before the FCC mandates LPTVs and translators make the switch. They weren't even considering authorizing digital translators until five or six months ago, when it became clear that some post-transition contours would fall short of pre-transition contours.

At any rate, we're starting to hear concrete "PLATE OFF" times for tomorrow. Stock up on popcorn!


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: K3ZS on June 11, 2009, 01:49:11 PM
One neat thing about digital TV is the use of same channel repeaters.  In my area the PBS station is repeated on the same frequency as the original transmitter on top of a local mountain.   The NBC station was doing the same, but for some reason switched RF channels, probably due to too much overlap between the repeater and the actual station in some areas.  In areas where the repeated signal and original are the same amplitude it looks like multipath to the receiver and breaks up the picture.



Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: flintstone mop on June 11, 2009, 01:56:41 PM
NOW there is a warning from the GREEN committees that the switch to digital will cause high lead levels in the landfills, as people throw away their old CRT TV's.
Supposedly a lot of lead inside a CRT.


Fred


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Pete, WA2CWA on June 11, 2009, 02:33:21 PM
NOW there is a warning from the GREEN committees that the switch to digital will cause high lead levels in the landfills, as people throw away their old CRT TV's.
Supposedly a lot of lead inside a CRT.


Fred

I don't know other places, but around here, you can't dump a TV for "normal" trash pickup. You have to call the local public works (trash pickup) to schedule a curbside TV trash pickup. Like wise, if you take it to the local trash/recycling/dump facility, they have a "special place" there for TV's, monitors, computers, appliances, grass, newspaper, cardboard, etc. For TV's, monitors, and computers, you even have to sign a sheet indicating what you are dropping off.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Steve - WB3HUZ on June 11, 2009, 02:36:46 PM
Heh, heh, New Jersey.


NOW there is a warning from the GREEN committees that the switch to digital will cause high lead levels in the landfills, as people throw away their old CRT TV's.
Supposedly a lot of lead inside a CRT.


Fred

I don't know other places, but around here, you can't dump a TV for "normal" trash pickup. You have to call the local public works (trash pickup) to schedule a curbside TV trash pickup. Like wise, if you take it to the local trash/recycling/dump facility, they have a "special place" there for TV's, monitors, computers, appliances, grass, newspaper, cardboard, etc. For TV's, monitors, and computers, you even have to sign a sheet indicating what you are dropping off.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Opcom on June 14, 2009, 11:27:01 PM
After using ours for a few months, I have one remaining complaint and it seems to belie one of the basic claims for DTV.

That claim being that much less power is required at the transmitter.  If this is true, it seems to just be a red hearing because they are not getting as much signal into my receiver as the analog stations do/did.

Not all of them are running their digital transmitters at full licensed power. You won't really know for another four days. It will then change again with allocation and equipment changes over the next year or so.

We're still not even to the halfway point of the transition. Once the NTSC transmitters go dark, then the ATSC transmitters can be put to full power. It costs too much money to run both at full strap at all times (with not one penny reimbursed).

We won't know how the transition went until it's actually happened. This long, agonizing limbo we've been stuck in is about to end. Good riddance, too.

At this point in the game, it's still too early to draw conclusions.

this might explain why one of the channel's digital signal seems to have improved much. Maybe they already cranked it since they turned the old TX off.


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: Opcom on June 14, 2009, 11:53:51 PM
Heh, heh, New Jersey.


NOW there is a warning from the GREEN committees that the switch to digital will cause high lead levels in the landfills, as people throw away their old CRT TV's.
Supposedly a lot of lead inside a CRT.


Fred

I don't know other places, but around here, you can't dump a TV for "normal" trash pickup. You have to call the local public works (trash pickup) to schedule a curbside TV trash pickup. Like wise, if you take it to the local trash/recycling/dump facility, they have a "special place" there for TV's, monitors, computers, appliances, grass, newspaper, cardboard, etc. For TV's, monitors, and computers, you even have to sign a sheet indicating what you are dropping off.

I think nearly all the lead is in the glass, and it cannot escape from the glass unless the glass is melted. The phosphors might be the worst part really. There's a good videos on youtube showing CRT and monitor recycling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPx09iB7R04
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8VfcmKDLiw

other interesting - doing it at home..:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1raLZg63jQ


Title: Re: Digital TV
Post by: WB2YGF on June 18, 2009, 11:05:15 PM
I don't know other places, but around here, you can't dump a TV for "normal" trash pickup. You have to call the local public works (trash pickup) to schedule a curbside TV trash pickup. Like wise, if you take it to the local trash/recycling/dump facility, they have a "special place" there for TV's, monitors, computers, appliances, grass, newspaper, cardboard, etc. For TV's, monitors, and computers, you even have to sign a sheet indicating what you are dropping off.
In Somerset County (NJ) you have to take TV's/monitors/computers to the County recycling center on the first Saturday of each month. They even have workers that remove the items from your car for you,  They pile the monitors on pallets and shrink wrap.  All you need to tell them is what borough/town/township you're from.  My trash collector will only pick up household trash NOTHING ELSE.  Recycling (Bottles, cans, newspapers, cardboard, dry cells) is picked up by the County bi-weekly in the special blue bins provided.
AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands